Pssst. Here's a hint. And here's how I know there's a problem with your reading comprehension.
You just said that "you say want vets to do it
but you say don't want vets to discuss it
".
Which part of my posts that say the veterans SHOULD handle it and leave the Republicans out of it don't you understand?
The rest of your nonsense post I just ignored.
I said that you said that you want vets to handle it.
The Vets here are discussing it and you are trying to prevent any discussion of it by saying that republicans should stay way from it.
Your point being that if a Vet is a "good" republican they will do nothing about Muthra for fear of embarassing the party.
Ergo you are trying to prevent what you are saying you want to happen I.E. Vets doing anything about Muthra.
See how hard it is to explain to you, your own words, even you don't know what you are saying.
In my mind, loyalty to the Party above all else, is a sure sign that the person making such a restriction on others is beyond the shadow any doubt a liberal.
For the simple reason that most republicans don't believe in such union thug/commissar/mafioso tactics of loyalty, republicans are loyal to conservative ideas and not to the party.