[bcsco]

No argument. I'm all for going after him tooth & nail. I simply believe the accusation against his military service ought to come from his service group; not Freepers, or anyone else for that matter. What made the Swift Boaters so successful was their relationship to Kerry. If it is to have the same effect on Murtha it should be handled the same way. Not only would add to the charge the benefit of being from 'someone who was there' but it would be an eerie reminder of Kerry's problems during the 2004 campaign. Boy, would that hit home with the American public.

Believe me, there's method in my madness. However, I'd still rather see him investigated and arraigned for all the other stuff. There's probably a lot more jail time involved. What would that do to Pelosi's corruption argument?

[Calpernia]

>>>>I'm all for going after him tooth & nail. I simply believe the accusation against his military service ought to come from his service group; not Freepers, or anyone else for that matter.

Why not anyone else? It was his service record that got him the position he holds. And, while in this position, his support and funding of the Afghan incident created funding for WTC'93.

Sheik Rahman was also instrumental in WTC'01 (see Lynne Stewart).

That makes it all of our concern.


>>> Believe me, there's method in my madness.

I'm listening. Share and maybe I'll agree.