Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drug Task Force nabs 10 (including Libertarian candidate for Boulder County Commissioner)
Colorado Daily ^ | Thursday, January 12, 2006

Posted on 01/15/2006 10:21:13 PM PST by presidio9

The Boulder County Drug Task Force announced Thursday it had arrested 10 people in connection with selling drugs on or near the Pearl Street Mall, including Jeff Christen-Mitchell, a Libertarian candidate for Boulder County Commissioner in 2004.

Christen-Mitchell was charged with one count each of distribution of marijuana; conspiracy to distribute marijuana; possession of marijuana with intent to sell; possession of more than 8 ounces of marijuana and possession of a schedule II controlled substance.

Other defendants facing various charges include Donald McNeese, April Martinez-Laveta, Justin Boyer, Greta Duderstadt, Charles Weddle, Dallas Elviro Dilaura, Diana Stough, Kenneth Finney and Joseph Gulla.

Warrants for the arrest of Daniel Rogers and Jerimiah Jordan, who are at large, were also issued.

A press release from the BCDT said the warrants came as the result of a three-month investigation that “had identified several persons involved in the distribution, and conspiracy to distribute, marijuana and controlled substances.'”

The release said the investigation also netted three search warrants, about $7000 in drug proceeds, 50 ounces of marijuana, 1 ounce of psilocybin mushrooms, assorted prescription drugs and some stolen property.

Authorities said in the release that the Task Force targeted the Pearl Street Mall because of its status as “a shopping, social and work destination for people living in Boulder and the surrounding area” and because “this activity attracts an element of people that detracts from the positive atmosphere of the mall and negatively impacts most people's quality of lifeŠ”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: donutrwatch; donutwatch; drugs; dudewheresmylawyer; epluribussmokepot; liberaltarians; libertarian; libertarianmoderator; libertarians; potheadphilosophy; wod; wodlist; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-222 next last
To: presidio9
Should it be legal for a law abiding citizen to purchase and own a stinger anti-aircraft missle?

Short answer ...yes.

Privately-owned cannons were used during the Revol;utionary War.

101 posted on 01/16/2006 8:29:26 AM PST by ActionNewsBill ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I promise to try to be more patronizing if you promise to share what's going on in that tiny head of yours.

Now I remember who you are...the silly little man who is only able to express his "argument" by the use of impotent insults.

Why don't you tell us all again why Red Bull and other caffeine-enhanced energy drinks should be banned?

I could use a good laugh.

102 posted on 01/16/2006 8:33:59 AM PST by ActionNewsBill ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
Short answer ...yes.

There you have it folks:

Bill thinks restrictions against private ownership of surface to air missles constitutes "gun control"

So tell me Bill: Should heroin be legal?

103 posted on 01/16/2006 8:34:26 AM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
Why don't you tell us all again why Red Bull and other caffeine-enhanced energy drinks should be banned?

Um, I might if I had ever said that. I have no problem with Red Bull.

Sheesh! What is it with you libertarians and memory problems?

104 posted on 01/16/2006 8:36:22 AM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
So tell me Bill: Should heroin be legal?

Legal and regulated.

105 posted on 01/16/2006 8:38:03 AM PST by ActionNewsBill ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
What is it with you libertarians and memory problems?

you are a real piece of work, dude...it was on one of the threads where you praised Ozzy.

Talk about memory problems.

106 posted on 01/16/2006 8:39:54 AM PST by ActionNewsBill ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
[heroin should be] Legal and regulated.

Thanks so much. You'll understand I like this to be out in the open so people understand what an out of touch lunatic you are. Then again, maybe you won't.

107 posted on 01/16/2006 8:40:35 AM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
you are a real piece of work, dude...it was on one of the threads where you praised Ozzy.

Sadly, no. Again, you are confused.

108 posted on 01/16/2006 8:41:22 AM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Did I say "impotence?" I meant ED. With ED it won't matter whether you're loaded with blanks or not, because the gun's broken. And this connection is not open to debate. It is accepted as well-documented.

I and dozens of my fellow long time cannabis connoisseurs are living proof that your information may be inaccurate. Of course there would be nothing new about inaccurate information being presented against cannabis use.

-----------------------------------------------------

Oh, and could we please try to avoid inane libertarian "two wrongs make a right logic" in the future? Thanks so much.

O.K. I'll cut the chase and get to the point.

The war against marijuana is the only way the federal government can make money from cannabis. If it were legal - the going price would be about $2. per ounce instead of $100. plus per ounce. By the fed.s keeping the price of cannabis artificially high - it allows the fat cat smuggling rings to stay very profitable. In short - your federal government is charging you over 10 billion dollars per year to make marijuana smuggling profitable. It has nothing to do with morals or harm to life.

109 posted on 01/16/2006 8:41:27 AM PST by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
You'll understand I like this to be out in the open so people understand what an out of touch lunatic you are.

Uh-huh, I guess the system we have in place is working real good keeping addicts from committing crimes.

Yep...that war on drugs is sure great.

110 posted on 01/16/2006 8:42:58 AM PST by ActionNewsBill ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Again, you are confused.

Nope...you can look it up.

111 posted on 01/16/2006 8:44:01 AM PST by ActionNewsBill ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: winston2
I and dozens of my fellow long time cannabis connoisseurs are living proof that your information may be inaccurate.

Not my information. Even knowledgable pro-pot advocates do not dispute this.

The war against marijuana is the only way the federal government can make money from cannabis. If it were legal - the going price would be about $2. per ounce instead of $100. plus per ounce. By the fed.s keeping the price of cannabis artificially high - it allows the fat cat smuggling rings to stay very profitable. In short - your federal government is charging you over 10 billion dollars per year to make marijuana smuggling profitable. It has nothing to do with morals or harm to life.

I'm sorry, you thought does not seem to have made it through the tinfoil intact. Are you saying that the fed.s are in cahoots with the unnamed fat cats?

112 posted on 01/16/2006 8:45:56 AM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
Nope...you can look it up.

Bill, it doesn't work that way. When you accuse me of something, it is your responsiblity to prove it, not mine.

Good luck with that.

113 posted on 01/16/2006 8:47:12 AM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: snuffy smiff

I stand by my position.

1. Everyone (over 21) should be allowed to grow their own marijuana. Ditto for opium plants, toxic mushrooms.

2. NO selling or "giving" it away. First offense punishable with public caning. Second offense, execution.

3. Anyone who buys said items gets a public caning.

4. In one or two years anyone who wants to get stupid can grow it themselves, it'll take the money out of it, and the risk of public pain and shame will do the rest.

5. Drug problem solved.

6. Meth? Death.


114 posted on 01/16/2006 8:48:36 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
Uh-huh, I guess the system we have in place is working real good keeping addicts from committing crimes.

And when heroin is cheaper and more plentiful, addiction will obviously disappear, right?

115 posted on 01/16/2006 8:50:30 AM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Are you saying that the fed.s are in cahoots with the unnamed fat cats?

It kind of reminds me of how the FDA is "protecting" the U.S. public from cheap foreign prescription drugs- so the domestic producers can make insanely high profits.

Might I say pharmaceutical lobbyists?

116 posted on 01/16/2006 8:54:02 AM PST by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: winston2

If you have evidence that there are politicians who are getting kickbacks for keeping drugs illegal, I suggest you quite your job and write a book about it immediately.


117 posted on 01/16/2006 8:56:44 AM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Funny. Just imagine the growth of big gov't necessary to control and regulate all the legalized drugs. Gov't growth would be exponential.

I prefer my solution I just posted.


118 posted on 01/16/2006 9:05:57 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The difference is tha mind-altering drugs including alcohol and the pills Bill's doctor has him on are all regulated.


119 posted on 01/16/2006 9:10:08 AM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

~grin~


120 posted on 01/16/2006 9:17:40 AM PST by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson