Skip to comments.
Griffin Tells Astronomers To Lower Expectations
Aviation Week & Space Technology ^
| 1/14/2006
| Frank Morring, Jr.
Posted on 01/16/2006 9:53:39 AM PST by Paul Ross
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: TheForceOfOne
21
posted on
01/16/2006 10:54:21 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: RightWhale
Dick Debartolo always has cool things he reviews.
Here is his website where I found that device originally.
http://www.gizwizbiz.com
To: TheForceOfOne
Got my eye on that one. I fell out of the astronomy hobby a while back but this might just get me back in.
23
posted on
01/16/2006 11:03:47 AM PST
by
jalisco555
("The right to bear weapons is the right to be free." A. E. Van Vogt)
To: newgeezer
That goes double for the nutjobs with dreams of colonizing space.They have all sorts of dreams, but they can't tell the difference between science fiction with science.
We have frigid deserts here on earth with air you can breath and 1/1000000 the cost to get there, but there isn't much interest in living there (except for a few government grant supported scientists in Antartica and a few Eskimos in the far north)
I'm all for space exploration as long as the funds to do it come solely from the people who want it done.
24
posted on
01/16/2006 11:04:35 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: TheForceOfOne
I had to click on the website, because I couldn't believe it: it is the same Dick DeBartolo who writes for Mad magazine!
25
posted on
01/16/2006 11:05:02 AM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
("Why thank you Mr.Obama, I'm proud to be a Darwinist!")
To: Paul Ross
The first people to establish a stable base at the lunar pole (where the ice is) will own the next century.
NASA seems to be doing the right thing, bizarrely - though probably too expensively as usual. Anyway: science is one thing, but the high ground needs to be seized.
26
posted on
01/16/2006 11:07:12 AM PST
by
agere_contra
(Protectionism is Socialism - it's welfare for uncompetitive people.)
To: from occupied ga
> I'm all for space exploration as long as the funds to do it come solely from the people who want it done.
So... should we sell Alaska and the Louisiana Purchase back?
27
posted on
01/16/2006 11:07:13 AM PST
by
orionblamblam
(A furore Normannorum libra nos, Domine)
To: Paul Ross
building linear accelerators on the moon to drop rocks on your head... Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress is science fiction.
28
posted on
01/16/2006 11:07:32 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: RightWingAtheist
Really? I didn't know that, how strange.
I listen to WBAL on my morning commute and he calls into the show on a regular basis. They link to his website at www.wbal.com (Baltimore)
To: orionblamblam
So... should we sell Alaska and the Louisiana Purchase back? And this is relevant because....?
30
posted on
01/16/2006 11:09:28 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: Paul Ross
then actively DENY us access to space. You nailed it. I believe that the water ice at the lunar pole will form the basis for future solar system resource development - it will be a "Panama Canal" style bottleneck for a hundred years. Consequently I would rather America owned it than the UN or the Chinese
31
posted on
01/16/2006 11:13:28 AM PST
by
agere_contra
(Protectionism is Socialism - it's welfare for uncompetitive people.)
To: from occupied ga
We have frigid deserts here on earth with air you can breath and 1/1000000 the cost to get there, but there isn't much interest in living thereYeah, but the nuttiest of the nutjobs want to colonize space in order to -- get this!!! -- prepare for the day when we're forced to abandon planet earth.
32
posted on
01/16/2006 11:17:12 AM PST
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: agere_contra
I believe that the water ice at the lunar pole will form the basis for future solar system resource development -Then form a company to exploit this. Raise the capital from like minded people who think the way you do, built a space ship and then sit back and make a fortune when your dream materializes (or not)
33
posted on
01/16/2006 11:17:56 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: orionblamblam
A valid question. Goes all the way back to the adoption of the new Constitution in 1787. Two radically opposed factions in FedGov, not even civil war put an end to it. Remember: almost every bridge was a Bridge to Nowhere at the time it was built.
34
posted on
01/16/2006 11:21:28 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: newgeezer
Yeah, but the nuttiest of the nutjobs want to colonize space in order to -- get this!!! -- prepare for the day when we're forced to abandon planet earth. I've gotten into "discussions" with them before. It's a religion with them. Facts are not welcome. They are true believers. As I look around the solar system, I don't see any place that will support human life except good old earth.
35
posted on
01/16/2006 11:22:03 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: from occupied ga
As I look around the solar system, I don't see any place that will support human life except good old earth.C'mon, Dude, you're just no fun at all. We can do anything given enough imagination and (other people's) money. Besides, you're not looking far enough. There's got to be another solar system out there. "To infinity and beyond!"
36
posted on
01/16/2006 11:25:59 AM PST
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: newgeezer
If you cut the income tax by 50% and cut nasa to zero except for voluntary contributions, there would be more than enough money.
37
posted on
01/16/2006 11:27:17 AM PST
by
staytrue
(MOONBAT CONSERVATIVES are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate)
To: newgeezer
prepare for the day when we're forced to abandon planet earth. That day will come. It may not be for one or two billion years, but it will come.
38
posted on
01/16/2006 11:32:05 AM PST
by
staytrue
(MOONBAT CONSERVATIVES are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate)
To: newgeezer
We can do anything given enough imagination and (other people's) money. Gosh, you're right I forgot the O'Neal colonies and the Lunar domes. Shouldn't take more than two or three time the total annual GDP to establish these (Well considering that government at all levels consumes over half of it now, maybe a bit more than that)
39
posted on
01/16/2006 11:35:18 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: from occupied ga
Heinlein's
The Moon is a Harsh Mistress is science fiction.
So was going to the moon ... until we went to the moon.
40
posted on
01/16/2006 11:50:03 AM PST
by
Fatuncle
(Were I not ignorant, I would not be here to learn things from you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-166 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson