Posted on 01/16/2006 7:39:03 PM PST by Jewels1091
The "New York Times" and "Newsweek" are not monolithic faceless alien oracles.
They are run by the the likes of the leftist homosexual on the right, ARTHUR SULZBERGER JR, and the socialist crook on the left, DONALD GRAHAM, Chair and CEO of Newsweek and Washington Post, son of CATHERINE GRAHAM MEYER, former owner of the Washington Post.
Every day these 2 enemies of the state unleash a horde of minor league propagandists on the American psyche in a blatant attempt to topple any GOP government that is elected by the American people.
They do not care if innocent civilians or soldiers die as a result and national security be damned.
2006 is the year they will be stopped.
They will no longer be able to hide unde a cloak of annonymity.
They will be exposed and their names equated with treacherous acts.
They and their komrades will be surveilled and brought up on charges.
OFFICERS
Chairman Emeritus: Arthur Ochs "Punch" Sulzberger, age 71, $1,397,200 pay (prior to title change)
Chairman; Publisher, The New York Times: Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr., age 46, $960,200 pay (prior to promotion)
VC and SVP: Michael Golden, age 48
President and CEO: Russell T. Lewis, age 50, $882,235 pay (prior to promotion)
SVP Operations and Acting CFO: John M. O'Brien, age 54
SVP and Deputy COO: David L. Gorham, $796,000 pay
Here comes the political show trial to set the basis for impeaching the President. If the ACLU can hook up with a leftist judge... The damage will be done for the next election. In addition Spector has put out the possibility that it will be a bipartisan impeachment by questioning the legality of the President spying on terrorists.
OK, thanks for the additional information. The thread was so long, I didn't catch that.
Sulzberger and Keller both were in the circuit when that article was published about the NSA. They both signed off on it. I'm looking forward to seeing them both in the same cell that Judith Miller occupied, until they agree to testify who were their sources in the NSA and/or the CIA that leaked classified information to their newspaper.
Personally, I'd prefer that no such order be issued, but that a very big and well orchestrated attempt to attack America again be very publicly thwarted using information obtained by the surveillance. Less deaths among the citizenry that way, and hopefully more deaths among the Jiahdies.
If? Can a bear do it in the woods?
When hallucigenic drugs are delivered to the NYT offices, can a full-blown expose' detrimental to the President, Republicans and/or conservatives, be far behind?
I cheated -- I started at the end and went back! :) No way was I starting at the beginning and going through the whole thread. I thought I had heard on a radio newsbreak that he was still scheduled to speak but they had technical difficulty getting a hook up so I figured someone would have the info.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.