Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Johnnyboy2000
"The estimates are what is believed by intelligence agencies around the world."

That's funny and megalomaniacal. You're not in the loop with "intelligence agencies around the world," and the FAS is one of the sites that I was referring to.

"...that Israel can solve all of its problems nuking its neighbors. They would probably end up killing themselves with all of the fallout considering many of it's enemies are on its border."

Try to join the military or find a fatherly teacher. Study leadership, tactics, weather patterns and a little about physics. The fallout wouldn't hurt Israel, and nearby targets can and will be taken care of conventionally. Hezbollah no longer has other military support in Lebanon. Try reading some real news instead of anti-American spews.

"It is my opinion and the opinion of many other informed people."

LOL! ...a shadow bandwagon.

"200 nukes could hit Iran and the country would be really messed up to say the least, but their psycho president would not mind because he is just that crazy. On the other hand, 5 nukes could literally wipe out Israel's entire population..."

..."200 nukes!" LOL! Your denials contradict your illusions about the capabilities of the nations you look up to.

Israel can knock anything that Iran can produce and launch at it out of the sky. And with very few nuclear weapons fired from Israel, the Iranian military and infrastructure would be stopped. And Iran's leaders would be dead. India eyeballing Pakistan as a cat would watch a mouse. Antagonistic, pagan Islamist nations have no effective nuclear offense and little more than millions of bodies for fertilizer to offer in any expanded conflict.

Iran's idolatrous leaders know that and won't cause any hasty move on our part with their ruse (ruse for the purpose of giving western Europe more cowardly excuses to blame us and more fully join them). But Iran is looking western Europe over for waves of ground terrorism while perpetuating a threat of nuclear exchange against countries there in the near future.

Even if Israel didn't exist (as you and your friends here obviously fantasize--see thread), Iran would begin to scare, extort and attack dhimmi western Europe.

Israel's tough. Western Europe's wimpy. What's western Europe going to do besides continuing to blame and try to keep the focus on the object of its hatred: the people of Israel and the USA?
235 posted on 01/18/2006 3:14:45 PM PST by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: familyop

Bump to your comments about pagan idolatrous Islam. Their new idol is the atomic bomb


243 posted on 01/18/2006 3:41:32 PM PST by dennisw ("What one man can do another can do" - The Edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

You act is getting old. First of all you don't know me or what I have done in my life or what I do now, so I won't even dignify your personal attack with a response. You sound tough when you are talking about what people you don't know are going to do to other people you don't know, but you would probably pee your pants if you ever had a gun pointed at you, or ever faced any real confrontation outside the fantasy land conflicts you make up in your head, in which Israel is some great Super Power that could conquer the entire planet with the drop of a hat.

If Israel is so strong and Europe so weak, why did they need France to prop them up for the first 20 years of their history? Why did they need France to build their nuclear reactors? Isn't that kind of pathetic to depend on France to defend your country? It is also safe to say that the French military is superior to that of Israel, so I wouldn't bash them as soft when they would hand Israel their ass on a silver platter in a military dispute. Americans can call France soft because we bailed them out of two wars. You don't sound very American to me because you defend Israel for spying on us, and selling our secrets to our enemies, and attacking the Liberty, and for getting our people rounded up and murdered in the Soviet Bloc. You call me anti-American for criticizing Isarel when you take Israel's side against America. It is easy to see where your loyalties lie, and it isn't with AMerica. You are all about what is best for Israel, and your only concern about America is that it continues to prop Israel up regardless of the consequences.

Every time some one brings up Israel wronging America you blame the American leadership, and the American intelligence community. You blamed the Liberty for getting attacked in international waters. You blamed the US for Pollard spying on us because we weren't giving Israel enough of our classified info. Not that they hadn't already been selling it to our enemies behind our back in the first place.

"India eyeballing Pakistan as a cat would watch a mouse."

Yeah a mouse with a nuclear arsenal that would kill 100s of millions of Indians. You are sickeningly uninformed. Pakistan has a very real nuclear capability, and Israel ABM syastem could not stop a large scale nuclear attck that would come in an exchange with Pakistan. The last thing Israel wants to do is pick a fight with Pakistan. Especially with their new air force that the US gave them. On a side not, Israel's security is the last thing India is concerned about.

You make many references to studying history. Maybe you should study what happens to isolated nations with small populations who are surrounded by enemies with huge booming populations.

From a realistic point of view it is a matter of time before the expanding Arab world swallows the state of Israel. You can get angry and call me names but it is not my doing. It is just an inevitablity. That is the way nations come and go.


The other poster made this point by describing the demographic bomb. the only way solve that would be for Israel to commit genocide. Committing genocide to protect the purity of a race. Where have I heard that before. Although they are your enemies, you have more in common with neo-Nazis and Islamists than I do. I don't speak about entire groups of people in blanket terms and state that they have less of a right to exist than I do.

You said:

"Antagonistic, pagan Islamist nations have no effective nuclear offense and little more than millions of bodies for fertilizer to offer in any expanded conflict."

You remind me of someone, but I cannot think of who it is. Oh yeah. It's Hitler. Look up pagan in the dictionary while your at it. There has never been a pagan muslim in the history of the world. It is an oxymoron you dunce.






254 posted on 01/18/2006 9:23:04 PM PST by Johnnyboy2000 (Give it all up tomorrow to live in world without crime, and go back to the circuit riding motocross)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson