Seems to undermine the pedophilia claim, huh?
Not if you read a bit further . . .
Individual Rights and Civil Order Section 22: "We would repeal existing laws and policies intended to condemn, affirm, encourage or deny sexual lifestyles, or any set of attitudes about such lifestyles. "
Would that lifestyle include pedophelia?
Libertarians THEN define children a bit differently. The children get to decide when they are adults just by standing up for their rights and moving out.
Individual Rights and Civil Order Section 21.
"However, children always have the right to establish their maturity by assuming administration and protection of their own rights, ending dependency upon their parents or other guardians, and assuming all responsibilities of adulthood."
Would that lifestyle include pedophelia?
In your imagination, perhaps. It's clearly written with fags/swingers/etc. in mind, not child abusers.
Individual Rights and Civil Order Section 21. "However, children always have the right to establish their maturity by assuming administration and protection of their own rights, ending dependency upon their parents or other guardians, and assuming all responsibilities of adulthood."
A tool which could just as easily be invoked as a means for a child to *escape* a molesting parent.