BARRETT REPORT RELEASED

OIC David Barrett ^ | January 18, 2006 | David Barrett

[mondonico]

Here it is:

Final Report

[OXENinFLA]

Ping...

[mondonico]

Press release:

OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT COUNSEL DAVID M. BARRETT 1990 K St., N.W., Suite 420 Washington, D.C. 20006 http://barrett.oic.gov
TELEPHONE: (202) 974-5440 FACSIMILE: (202) 974-5459
January 19, 2006

PRESS RELEASE

Today the United States Court of Appeals for the District for Columbia Circuit, Division for the Purpose of Appointing Independent Counsels, approved the release of the Final Report of the Independent Counsel in re: Henry G. Cisneros. The Report can be found on the Office’s website at http://barrett.oic.gov.

This has been a long and difficult investigation. It is my hope that people will read the entire Report and draw their own conclusions. An accurate title for the Report could be, “WHAT WE WERE PREVENTED FROM INVESTIGATING.”
After a thorough reading of the Report it would not be unreasonable to conclude as I have that there was a coverup at high levels of our government and, it appears to have been substantial and coordinated. The question is why? And that question regrettably will go unanswered. Unlike some other coverups, this one succeeded.

I recommend that people begin by reading the memorandum of Mr. John Filan, Chief of the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation Division in the South Texas District (Appendix no. 16).

[tiredoflaundry]

BTTT

[zeaal]

Funny that the Osama tape is released the same day the Barrett report is released.

[bnelson44]

So what is the 25-cent version of this?

[wallcrawlr]

reading

[Txsleuth]

IOW...the "scrubbed" version???

NO mention of the Clinton's shenanigans with the IRS??

[mondonico]

An accurate title for the Report could be, “WHAT WE WERE PREVENTED FROM INVESTIGATING.” After a thorough reading of the Report it would not be unreasonable to conclude as I have that there was a coverup at high levels of our government and, it appears to have been substantial and coordinated. The question is why? And that question regrettably will go unanswered. Unlike some other coverups, this one succeeded.

Wow.

[sure_fine]

saving

[Mo1]

They released it???

Tony Snow said this morning the Court blocked it

[eureka!]

marking

[Peach]

So it DID get released today after all. Will read later but I'll bet the word Clinton doesn't appear anywhere in it.

[mewzilla]

Is this the redacted version?

[Howlin]

Yes.

[cake_crumb]

Whole thing or redacted version?

[elc]

I won't hold my breath until someone leaks those redacted parts.

[Preachin']

"So what is the 25-cent version of this?"

Same ole same ole

[Blood of Tyrants]

Several portions were redacted.