Skip to comments.
Geometry may be hard-wired into brain, study shows
Reuters ^
| Thu Jan 19, 2006
| Anon
Posted on 01/20/2006 3:11:23 AM PST by Pharmboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: Netheron
Relativity is counterintuitive, an intellectual contract on the same order as atomic theory. Kant was right to say that we can only perceive three dimensions. Science as a whole has gone beyond our ability to imagine in the original sense of the word. It has become a code, and only the code-breakers can interpret it.
41
posted on
01/20/2006 8:34:10 AM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Pharmboy
Fascinating article. Thanks for posting it.
42
posted on
01/20/2006 8:34:52 AM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
(Creationism Is Not Conservative!)
To: tertiary01
It could be you were mistaught. Many math teachers really don't understand their subject.
43
posted on
01/20/2006 8:36:12 AM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Old Professer
What is better displayed here is the seeming fact that not all children come equipped with the same ability to intuit the obvious and that is a phenomenon for social study, not the science of mathematics, per se.
Just as some people have a great sense of direction and others seemingly dont. For some math comes easy, others have to struggle. I think much of it has to do, not with the wiring of the brain but with upbringing nurture, not nature.
But my opinion might be a result of having a degree in Sociology.
44
posted on
01/20/2006 8:48:45 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: RobbyS
But Kant didn't say that we could only perceive three dimensions. Kant said that there WERE only three dimensions. He was directly saying that the existence of four or more dimensions was absolutely impossible. Kant made specific statements about the actual structure of the universe which have been proven false.
Anyhow, there are two refutations to the perceiving three dimensions issue.
1) Many mathematicians, who spend a long time working with four (and higher) dimensional objects, actually do develop the ability to perceive them in the same way that people normally perceive three dimensonal ones.
2) Physics experiments are perception, that's why we do them.
45
posted on
01/20/2006 8:49:12 AM PST
by
Netheron
To: RobbyS
I took that into account. Maybe it was due to a difference in textbooks, but I think most explain Geometry in the same linear fashion.
46
posted on
01/20/2006 9:10:20 AM PST
by
tertiary01
(Dems ..the party that repeats history's mistakes over and over and....)
To: tertiary01
>> I think most explain Geometry in the same linear fashion. <<
Well...
47
posted on
01/20/2006 9:45:33 AM PST
by
dangus
To: Pharmboy
Geometry may be hard-wired into brain, study showsPersonally, I have always had a thing for nice curves and shapes. It almost seems programmed into me...
48
posted on
01/20/2006 11:54:17 AM PST
by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: Junior
["All participants, even those aged 6, performed well above the chance level of 16.6 percent," they found. The average score was nearly 67 percent correct -- identical to the score for U.S. children.] So, primitive hunter-gatherers who have never been inside a classroom score as high on geometry as American children who are being "educated" at $10,000 per head per year.
To be fair, the comparison was for 6-year-olds. Not many 6-year-olds are getting any kind of "education" beyond how to sit at their desks, color within the lines, and playing well with others. The "$10,000 per head" education comes when they get older.
Now let's compare the abilities of the US students versus the hunter-gathers on, say, trigonometry when they're 18.
To: Junior
So, primitive hunter-gatherers who have never been inside a classroom score as high on geometry as American children who are being "educated" at $10,000 per head per year. The $10,000 figure is because someone has to cosine for those under 18.
50
posted on
01/20/2006 12:31:37 PM PST
by
Ken H
To: Netheron
He said that three dimensions(and Euclidean geometry) are a priori but that has to do with us, not the universe except as we are part of it. It was his concession to realism, so I should have said that even the idealists like him made that concession. Any scientists has to be a realist. Some people are capable of great flights of imagination. Wasn't it Michaelangelo was could like a stone and visualize the figure within?
51
posted on
01/20/2006 1:15:28 PM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Ichneumon
I didn't get that the U.S. students were six; I understood it to include hunter-gatherers from the age of six on.
52
posted on
01/20/2006 1:23:13 PM PST
by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: xzins
LOLOLOL! Thank you oh so very much for the encouragements!
To: Pharmboy
I was just horrible at algebra and suffered through it with C's during high school. Meanwhile, I aced geometry and actually tutored some of the A+ algebra students suffered horribly with C's in geometry. I just loved doing proofs.
I wonder what that says about how my mind is wired?
To: hispanarepublicana
I wonder what that says about how my mind is wired?Sounds like all the right connections are there...
55
posted on
01/20/2006 2:58:31 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: PatrickHenry
A math ping list sounds good!
56
posted on
01/21/2006 6:52:32 PM PST
by
phantomworker
(Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.)
To: phantomworker
57
posted on
01/21/2006 7:18:41 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
OK, but maybe I'll need some coaching. Never owned a ping list before.
Does that mean I need to start reading more math articles then? LOL! I guess that would be a good excuse to start. Thanks!
58
posted on
01/21/2006 7:29:06 PM PST
by
phantomworker
(Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.)
To: phantomworker
I can give you a few names to start off with, and a template for a logo. Or you can experience the joy of doing it all by yourself.
59
posted on
01/21/2006 7:31:27 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
Sounds good. LOL. I have enough joy in my life, thanks. When I find a good article, I would appreciate your help. Thanks!
60
posted on
01/21/2006 7:41:01 PM PST
by
phantomworker
(Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson