Posted on 01/20/2006 6:31:27 PM PST by Wiz
With the most fiercely fought Canadian election in more than a decade taking place on Monday, the crossfire of political rhetoric between the incumbent prime minister and his Conservative Party challenger is becoming heated but which one is more trustworthy?
According to a new computer algorithm, Prime Minister Paul Martin, of the Liberal Party, spins the subject matter of his speeches dramatically more than Conservative Party leader, Stephen Harper, and the New Democratic Party leader, Jack Layton.
Spin, in this case, is defined as text or speech where the apparent meaning is not the true belief of the person saying or writing it, says the algorithms developer, David Skillicorn at Queens University in Ontario, Canada.
He and his team analysed the usage patterns of 88 deception-linked words within the text of recent campaign speeches from the political leaders. They then determined the frequency of these patterns in each speech, and averaged that number over all of that candidates speeches. Martin received a ranking of 124, while Harper and Layton scored 73 and 88, respectively.
I think its expected that any party in power is going to use spin more than the challenging party, Skillicorn says. They have a track record to defend.
(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...
Spun the results
I imagine that a computer program set up to detect the lying of the democratic party here in the US would overload.
The consept of a "new computer algorithm" sets off my BS detector.
LOVE the graphic! One for the Cdn list!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.