Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the West Will Attack Iran
Asia Times ^ | 1/23/2006 | Spengler

Posted on 01/23/2006 6:12:39 AM PST by Rutles4Ever

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: elfman2; Per-Ling
[Estimating the duration of viability of Iran’s proven petroleum reserves] ELFMAN2: Here’s what I did with 10 minutes to kill:

Our collective effort is showing different answers for good reason. Your equation is flat in that it does not consider increase in global demand. For my 40 year guess, I estimated that Iran will average a 3.75% contribution to global consumption over the next twenty years. This is not far off from where they are today. If you look at the increase in global consumption from 1980 to 2000, it's easy to determine a linear equation, y=M*x+b. Use calculus to speed things up… Take the integral of the linear global consumption equation from 2006 to 2026 and it will reveal total global consumption over the next 20 years. 3.75% of that is about half of Iran’s proven reserves. Therefore, if Iran is going to pump half its reserves in 20years, it’ll pump them all out in 40years.

There are flaws in both our models as I’m sure there are with Spengler’s. There is no proven method to predict the future for systems as complex as the one we’re trying to model. When petroleum is as expensive as it is now, the energy economy provides “opportunity” to other technologies which are currently cost effective. Unfortunately, if the price of crude settles below the alternative energy’s cost effective threshold, investors will lose their investments as markets transfer away from alternatives energy back to crude. So that’s one aspect that is difficult if not impossible to account for when modeling consumption. Another variable I didn’t bother with is this… We know population growth and industrial growth are modeled with exponential equations and my quick estimate does not consider either. I bet Spengler's did and that's where he came up with 20years.

But I digress... What we've done is provide three estimates for the duration of viability for Iran's proven reserves. Spengler says ~20, I say ~40 and you say ~90. If Iran pulls a unilateral embargo or gets hit with sanctions each of our estimates will hiccup. Nevertheless, we should still try to predict the future! What the hell else would we do with all of these brains? lol… BTW: Good Commentary BTTT.


61 posted on 01/24/2006 5:25:30 AM PST by humint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: humint
My guess is that if we applied a 3.75% growth to Iran’s neighbors, they’d all run dry about the same time, still leaving Iran without a reason to invade :^)

I think all those models attempt to predict the life of world supply, with assumptions like you mentioned, but are irrelevant to a single nation. Using them like that is like measuring the average income growth of a neighborhood to predict it for a neighbor, from the general to the specific. Check out the chart from my last link for Iran’s production history.

Carry that decline forward and maybe their oil will last 1000 years ;^) I wouldn’t want to predict when they will run dry. But If I had to, I wouldn’t base a radical thesis on a lowball 20 year prediction as was done here.

Good talking with you BTW.

62 posted on 01/24/2006 6:53:52 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson