I ran across similar observations in the great interview with Robert Duvall by Timothy E. Rhys in Moviemaker magazine. Duvall is one conservative whose talent is so overwhelming that the best Hollywood has been able to do to him is to shut him out of Oscar consideration. He is one of the most brilliant men ever to grace the silver screen, as a writer, director and producer as well as an actor. Here's a snip of the interview:
What do you think about how outspoken Hollywood has been with the anti-war rhetoric?
The way Hollywood speaks out is absolutely beyond me. Some people are so ill-informed.
You dont mind them speaking out, as long as theyre better informed?
I mean, why be so outspoken about it anyway? Does it help Sean Penns career to go over to Iraq? Did it help Jane Fonda to go over to Vietnam years ago? I dont know. But sometimes when these guys speak out I get embarrassed.
You dont talk politically very often, do you.
Not so much in public. You know, youre safe if youre a liberal in Hollywood. Youre safe if you speak out like that.
So youd obviously consider yourself more of a conservative.
Somewhat, yeah. We were at was at a New Years Eve party and this guy, typical Hollywood, says something and I said Wait a minute. Are you implying that you voted for George Bush? And he slouches I mean, its very easy to be liberal in Hollywood, but if youre not people are actually afraid. In Hollywood they can be so vicious toward anybody with an opinion thats a little different from the majority.
Thats really why you couldnt get The Apostle funded, isnt it?
I think theres a connection I think theres a connection. Nobody wants to deal with anything"right wing." Never mind fundamentalist.
Yeah, and not even just right wing. They dont want to show the truth, show something as it really is. They want to make a comment. But frankly, the bottom line is dollars, even more than being political.
With Tango, did you think about the market at all when you were writing? After your experiences with Apostle, did you have any market considerations?
I was just trying to make a movie, you know? ... The Apostle eventually found a good audience. We grossed $34 million, which is pretty good for that kind of film.
You shouldve won the Academy Award for your performance. Ive always said that.
Some people told me that performance was overdone. I dont think they understand the South.
You deserved it, no question. Did it bother you that you didnt win?
If Id been taking odds in Vegas [Laughs] But you know, certain guys are the darlings of that town. And its almost like a popularity contest. Ill tell you when I was even more shocked. When I didnt win the Emmy for Lonesome Dove. So those two times, yeah. I felt I shouldve won. Back when I did The Great Santini, and I didnt win, it was okay because De Niro was terrific in Raging Bull. Im gonna give him that one.... He was wonderful. The movie was great. Everybody was great in it. But these other movies, when you can see legitimate defects from an actors point of view, ooooh. Thats different
(To read the entire interview, click here)
Thanks, I loved "The Apostle". Duval was great in it and I never knew he was (at least somewhat) conservative!