To: Sub-Driver
"Obviously, I support tracking down terrorists. I think that's our obligation. But I think it can be done in a lawful way," the New York Democrat said. Playing both sides against the middle. It might work, seeing as the press is in her pocket.
2 posted on
01/25/2006 11:40:11 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
Oh no, here we go again. Another one of those flip flopping politicians. She's for eavesdropping but she's against eavesdropping?
16 posted on
01/25/2006 11:47:23 AM PST by
OldFriend
(The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
To: Cicero
"Please, Senator Clinton, can you explain in a detailed and explicit way exactly how you would track down terrorists without accessing their communications?"
29 posted on
01/25/2006 11:54:32 AM PST by
ArmyTeach
(Pray daily for our troops.)
To: Cicero
"Obviously, I support tracking down terrorists. I think that's our obligation. But I think it can be done in a lawful way," the New York Democrat said. You think? I think this gets translated down to the basic, long-standing impression that on defense issues, the GOP position is "We defend America" and the Dem position is "We defend America, too, but..." And then fill in the blank with whatever the complaint of the day is.
36 posted on
01/25/2006 12:05:17 PM PST by
Huck
(Roe/Kelo: You have a right to privacy IN your bedroom; you just don't have a right TO your bedroom.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson