Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/27/2006 1:29:38 PM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: areafiftyone

Has Pryor opposed liberal activists being confirmed for the court?


2 posted on 01/27/2006 1:30:33 PM PST by My2Cents (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
He added, without prompting, that he did not support a filibuster against Alito because “one is not warranted.”

Like I said, the votes for a filibuster aren't there. They might get about 30 if they really tried.

3 posted on 01/27/2006 1:31:29 PM PST by TheBigB (Moooooomm! I'll pick up my clothes later! I'm busy raging aginst the machine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Just remember all those "social conservatives" who helped put this guy into office.


4 posted on 01/27/2006 1:32:14 PM PST by iPod Shuffle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

As if Ginsberg (who has openly expressed support of abortion on demand many times) would be expected to be fair and impartial on any Roe v. Wade trial. If I were the attorney representing a pro-life trial in the Supreme Court, the first thing I would do is gather my ammo and then ask Ginsberg to recuse herself.


5 posted on 01/27/2006 1:32:34 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Just absolutely aghast at the reasons these liberals are using.

However, the real reason is the pressure from the New York Slimes.
6 posted on 01/27/2006 1:32:45 PM PST by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

“Can he be fair and impartial if he’s on the United States Supreme Court? And would he be an activist, would he legislate from the bench, would he come with an agenda? I spent a lot of time looking at that. I must say when it comes to the question of whether Samuel Alito will be fair and impartial, I have doubts, I have reservations.” So he said, while it was a close call, he would vote no.



Talk about hypocrisy? Yes, he would be an ACTIVIST -- and activist for SUPPORTING THE LAW, SUPPORTING THE CONSTITUTION AND NOT LEGISLATING FROM THE BENCH. That is my kind of ACTIVIST. And again, Alito just may be one of those REPUBLICAN ACTIVISTS who obeys the law -- just too dangerous for America!!!!


7 posted on 01/27/2006 1:33:31 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

This Pryor guy is becoming more of a creep as time goes on. The monument thing was bad enough...


8 posted on 01/27/2006 1:34:07 PM PST by ovrtaxt ("I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born."- Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Looks like senators have a new reason to vote against a nominee, the nominee "might" do something in the future that they "may" not agree with.


10 posted on 01/27/2006 1:37:18 PM PST by jazusamo (A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

He's already planning on apologizing. That means he knows his vote is wrong, but he's doing it for political reasons.

/spit


11 posted on 01/27/2006 1:38:26 PM PST by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

It's all about killing the (unwanted) children.

Are Arkansans proud to elect such murderers?


12 posted on 01/27/2006 1:39:55 PM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

57% of people in Arkansas support Alito yet both their senators are voting no. These two partisan hacks need to be "Daschled" in this conservative state.


13 posted on 01/27/2006 1:40:27 PM PST by NapkinUser ("Our troops have become the enemy." -Representative John P. Murtha, modern day Benedict Arnold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Down to 55 to 45 final vote. The Republican National Committee needs to cut funding for all these RINOs. There is no reason Pryor should vote against Alito and no excuse for him not to do so.
14 posted on 01/27/2006 1:41:04 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Reactions: Family Council says it's a mystery. Republican Party says it's "disappointing" to have Pryor and Lincoln "cater to Ted Kennedy."

Why is Kennedy allowed to have such power in the Senate? It's sad that a man of such low moral character can hold sway over anyone?
18 posted on 01/27/2006 1:43:16 PM PST by gsrinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
What he said:But I'm concerned that over time he might chip away at those checks and balances and allow the exeuctive power to expand until it's supreme over the other branches

What it really means when run backwards from the Language Liberalizer: Since we're in the minority, we can no longer legislate our evil ways. And we have no hope of winning back the White House anytime soon. The Judiciary is our last hope to keep our extreme agenda alive.

19 posted on 01/27/2006 1:43:34 PM PST by TravisBickle (The War on Terror: Win It There or Fight It Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
But there’s a third criterion, he said. “Can he be fair and impartial if he’s on the United States Supreme Court?"

Like this impartiality was a big concern back when thier candidates came on the court. I head today that, mathmatically, their judges were confirmed with 1/2 the questions that they have used to block Alito (excuse me, I meant "they have used to completely interview Alito.")

20 posted on 01/27/2006 1:45:04 PM PST by 50sDad (It's not "diversity" for you to steal my Christmas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
What a JERK!
21 posted on 01/27/2006 1:46:30 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
To Democrats fair is when you agree 100% with their ideas.
I doubt Judge Alito will harbor ill feelings when he becomes a supreme judge but, if it were me I would remember every one of these rats for the rest of my life. I would kill every democrat case that came before me weather it was right or wrong. Thats why i'm not a judge and he is.
25 posted on 01/27/2006 1:56:39 PM PST by buck61 (luv6060)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I'm confused. Isn't that third criterion Pryor is talking about part of proper judicial temperament?


28 posted on 01/27/2006 2:58:24 PM PST by rwa265 (The Promises of the Lord, I Will Proclaim Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I had hopes that Pryor was a 'different kind' of democrat. I was wrong. Dance, Postman, dance/.


32 posted on 01/27/2006 5:06:59 PM PST by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

When is Pryor up for re-election? Can the RNC run ads in Arkansas (a firmly red state) linking Mark Pryor to the radical leftist extremism of Ted Kennedy?


33 posted on 01/27/2006 5:08:32 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson