Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nwrep

I predict we will see a third party develop within the next few years. I think that a good 10-20% of the American people are either socialists or communists. Their numbers have grown to the point that they will have their own voice and the strength to support their own candidates. Scary, but I think that it is happening. They also now have the financial support that they didn't have in the past.


37 posted on 01/28/2006 10:09:13 AM PST by toomanygrasshoppers ("In technical terminology, he's a loon")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: toomanygrasshoppers
I predict we will see a third party develop within the next few years. I think that a good 10-20% of the American people are either socialists or communists. Their numbers have grown to the point that they will have their own voice and the strength to support their own candidates. Scary, but I think that it is happening. They also now have the financial support that they didn't have in the past.

I don't think this is that scary. It will merely triangulate the left into moderate left, extreme left/communist left.

47 posted on 01/28/2006 10:15:20 AM PST by Sans-Culotte (Meadows Place, TX-"Tom DeLay Country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: toomanygrasshoppers
we will see a third party develop

If the new party is on the left, I approve.

74 posted on 01/28/2006 10:29:47 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (End vote fraud. End the Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: toomanygrasshoppers
I think that a good 10-20% of the American people are either socialists or communists. Their numbers have grown to the point that they will have their own voice and the strength to support their own candidates. Scary, but I think that it is happening.

That would only be scary in a country with continental European-style proportional representation, in which each electoral districts sends multiple representatives.

Here, we have the Anglo-Saxon "first past the post" or "winner take all" system. You only need a plurality of votes to win, not an absolute majority, and each district sends one representative. That means that even if the barking-mad commies had 30%, the remaining decent Democrats had 30%, and we had 40%, we could still shove a conservative agenda right down all their throats.

There are advantages and disadvantages to such a system. In Canada and England it has caused conservatives to get fewer seats than their popular vote would deserve. It also encourages gerrymandering. But looking back to the election of 2000, when Ralph Nader siphoned off a lot of Gore's votes, it is the reason Bush was elected in the first place.

If the Left eats itself and splinters into two parties, it will mean Republican supremacy for a generation. We should all be sending money to the Daily Kos.

-ccm

136 posted on 01/28/2006 11:14:30 AM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: toomanygrasshoppers

You seem shocked that this would be the case. America has always had commies and socialists since there have been such people.

In fact, in the early-mid 1900's, they were at dangerously high levels.

If you think that America somehow will gain tons of them though, you are mistaken. They will never be a political force capable of actually winning elections or coming close. But, they will help peel off Dem votes if they become strong enough.


172 posted on 01/28/2006 12:23:36 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson