Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VIDEO! IRAQI GENERAL: SADDAM MOVED WMD TO SYRIA BEFORE INVASION
MSNBC, GEORGES SADA | 01.29.06 | Mia T

Posted on 01/29/2006 11:36:47 AM PST by Mia T

~SEE VIDEO~
IRAQI GENERAL: SADDAM MOVED WMD TO SYRIA BEFORE INVASION
(ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE, CINDY SHEEHAN)
by Mia T, 01.29.06







CINDY SHEEHAN: ECHO OF THE LEFT
the democrats are gonna get us killed (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) series
5

by Mia T, 8.28.05

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 

DEBUNKING CINDY SHEEHAN
HEAR ABE LINCOLN/JOHNNY CASH + PBS' NEIL CONAN
by Mia T, 8.31.05

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)


"You tell me the truth. You tell me that my son died for oil. You tell me that my son died to make your friends rich. You tell me my son died to spread the cancer of Pax Americana, imperialism in the Middle East."--Cindy Sheehan

"And if you think I won't say bulls**t to the President, I say move on, cause I'll say what's on my mind."--Cindy Sheehan

 

The trusty triad's half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies, confounded by fog of war, vagaries of peace and uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds, remind us that things are not always what they first seem. The UN Oil-for-Food scandal, for example, has shown us it was not "going to war with Iraq" that was "all about oil," but rather, "not going to war with Iraq." The Left, we now see, had that one, (as they have most things), exactly backward.

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they aid and abet.

Mia T, 5.15.04
pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

 

 

 

"We didn't understand why the United States was there. We never thought that Iraq was an imminent threat to the United States."--Cindy Sheehan

 

 

"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option."

President Bush

 

 

 

"He was murdered by Bush."--Cindy Sheehan

"You get that evil maniac out here, 'cause a Gold Star Mother, somebody whose blood is on his hands, has some questions for him."--Cindy Sheehan


"The biggest terrorist is George W. Bush."--Cindy Sheehan

 

"This seems to be the President's reasons for continuing the war. Because he's killed so many American soldiers already, he has to kill more and I believe that's the most insane and immoral reason for continuing the war"--Cindy Sheehan

 

Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.

Abraham Lincoln
"Gettysburg Address"
November 19, 1863




TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bric; bush; china; cindysheehan; cis; clinton; iraq; islam; israel; russia; saddam; sheehan; syria; terrorism; waronterror; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2006 11:36:49 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Nah, ya think?


2 posted on 01/29/2006 11:43:36 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

ping


3 posted on 01/29/2006 11:45:11 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


4 posted on 01/29/2006 11:45:34 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kjo

;)


5 posted on 01/29/2006 11:47:05 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

ping


6 posted on 01/29/2006 11:48:21 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T


I'd like to believe this - but if it's coming from MSNBC...

I mean, they'd NEVER run a story like this unless it was going to help the left in some way/shape/form....


7 posted on 01/29/2006 11:48:51 AM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Good post.

The weapons were there. I know this...my background and all...Army chemical weapons guy.

I'm glad that the Iraqi general has come forward to confirm this .


8 posted on 01/29/2006 11:50:16 AM PST by AlaninSA (It's one nation under God -- brought to you by the Knights of Columbus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

I guess they figured the story's already out... The interviewer WAS tough on him. But he came across as credible.


9 posted on 01/29/2006 11:52:28 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Mia T. bump.


10 posted on 01/29/2006 11:53:52 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA

He had to be prodded. He has put his life in danger....

The illogic from the left on WMD is scary. Either they are idiots, i.e., they believed it, or they think their constituency is, i.e., it was pure demagoguery. Either way, they are not fit to serve.


11 posted on 01/29/2006 11:57:28 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.

thanx :)


12 posted on 01/29/2006 11:58:15 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Doesn't matter.

"Bush lied, people died" etc etc.


13 posted on 01/29/2006 11:58:59 AM PST by joonbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Great post, thanks!

...and thanks to the General for confirming what we all knew already.

14 posted on 01/29/2006 12:03:30 PM PST by infidel29 ("We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

And their retroactive 'Monday morning quarterback" reasoning persists to this day. The Democrats need a good course in logic. And one in ethics, while they're at it.


15 posted on 01/29/2006 12:04:18 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: infidel29

thanx and bump for the general.


16 posted on 01/29/2006 12:05:10 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

Note that Saddam was doing a nuke deal with China.


17 posted on 01/29/2006 12:06:44 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom

ping


18 posted on 01/29/2006 12:09:37 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

ping


19 posted on 01/29/2006 12:10:10 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Republic

ping


20 posted on 01/29/2006 12:10:57 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
Iraqi General: Syria Gave Al Qaida Saddam's WMDs
NewsMax, 1/29/06

 

A former senior military advisor to Saddam Hussein is warning that the chemical weapons used by top Al Qaida terrorist Abu Musab al Zarqawi in a foiled 2004 plot to attack Amman, Jordan were the same weapons Saddam Hussein transported to Syria before the U.S. invasion.

Gen. Georges Sada offered the stunning revelation Saturday while explaining why he didn't decide to go public about Saddam's hidden WMD stockpile until recently.

"As a general, you see, we should keep our secrets," Gen. Sada told WABC Radio's Monica Crowley. But when news broke of the foiled WMD attack on Amman, he changed his mind.

"I understood that the terrorists were going to make an explosion in Amman in Jordan . . . . and they were targeting the prime minister of Jordan, the intelligence [headquarters] of Jordan, and maybe the American embassy in Jordan - and they were going to use the same chemical weapons which we had in Iraq," he told WABC.

Last week, Gen. Sada generated headlines when he told the New York Sun that Saddam had shipped his biological and chemical weapons stockpiles to Syria in the weeks before the U.S. attacked in March 2003.

But until yesterday, the former top Iraqi official had said nothing about al Qaida gaining access to those same weapons.

"It was a major, major operation. It would have decapitated the government," said Jordan's King Abdullah at the time, in an interview about the Zarqawi plot with the San Francisco Chronicle.

Had it succeeded, the WMD strike would have been the most deadly terrorist attack in world history, with Jordanian officials estimating that Zarqawi's al Qaida team could have killed up to 20,000 people.

While King Abdullah said that trucks containing chemical weapons had come from Syria, he did not identify Iraq as the ultimate source of Zarqawi's WMDs.

Gen. Sada, however, said he had no doubt that Zarqawi intended to use the same chemical weapons Saddam had sent to Syria.

Telling Crowley that he was "shocked" when news of the Zarqawi plot broke, Saddam's former top advisor recalled thinking: "My God, I know many things. How can I keep them [secret any longer]."

Gen. Sada also detailed on Saturday the Iraqi dictator's plan to launch his own WMD attack during the first Gulf War, explaining, "He wanted to attack Israel with chemical weapons."

The top Iraqi military man recalled a meeting of senior defense ministers where Saddam ordered: "I want you to do two things that are very important - to attack Israel and to attack Saudi Arabia with chemical weapons."

Gen. Sada said the planned WMD strike was to be carried out by 98 aircraft, including Soviet-built Sukhoi 24s, MiGs and French-built Mirage jets.

"One wave would fly through Syria and the other wave through Jordan and then penetrate to Israel," he said.

Gen. Sada recalled that he was the only one to raise objections, warning Saddam that such an attack would surely provoke a nuclear response from Tel Aviv.

"I told all this directly [to Saddam] and everybody was listening. If a needle was dropped on the carpet you would hear it," he told Crowley.

After presenting a nearly two-hour-long argument against the WMD attack, Gen. Sada said Saddam was finally persuaded to pull the plug on the deadly operation.

21 posted on 01/29/2006 12:19:28 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
It was going to come out sooner or later. I am gratefful for Sada's bravery and his willingness to put himself in jeopardy by revealing what he knows. It would be wonderful to see every accusing politician and journalist loaded up on a jet and transported to Syria for an unveiling of the truth.

Nice job once again, Mia T. I love your relentless pursuit of the real story.

22 posted on 01/29/2006 12:22:53 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thank you, Mia T.


23 posted on 01/29/2006 12:38:57 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

In one segment that I heard the "no spin" master himself dismissed the author (no mention of his rank) as some guy trying to sell a book. We need more evidence than that said Bill O'Reilly on his radio show last week. Oh well, at least he didn't say this was "swiftboating" Saddam.


24 posted on 01/29/2006 1:19:17 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (Hillary is the she in shenanigans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith

thanx:)
Sada's bravery bump


25 posted on 01/29/2006 2:27:39 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Proud FR Ping!

Mia you are magnificent


26 posted on 01/29/2006 2:33:57 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
thank you, backhoe :)
27 posted on 01/29/2006 2:34:09 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

:)
FR bump


28 posted on 01/29/2006 2:40:09 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA; Mia T

My husband was also Chemical Corps, he says the same thing.


29 posted on 01/29/2006 2:49:25 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Wow, again


bookmarked ~ I know I'll want to refer to this one again!!

30 posted on 01/29/2006 3:15:10 PM PST by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Syria has Saddams WMD. Iran has been visiting Syria a lot lately. Hmmmm
IMHO Syria is giving the WMD's to Iran for when we attack them.

Things are getting interesting.


31 posted on 01/29/2006 3:19:28 PM PST by Delmarksman (Pro 2A Anglican American (Ford and Chevy kill more people than guns do, lets ban them))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

what a surprise.........NOT! good article though mia!


32 posted on 01/29/2006 4:34:19 PM PST by marta R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
My husband was also Chemical Corps, he says the same thing.

We chem guys often had the chance to see things that were "not for media release." I can say with absolute confidence that the weapons were there...and, although I don't know this for sure, my educated guess is that they ended up in Syria.

33 posted on 01/29/2006 4:42:05 PM PST by AlaninSA (It's one nation under God -- brought to you by the Knights of Columbus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Do you know about this video---the Hitlery video? the Peter Paul video?


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8571783130742638160&q=peter+f.+paul


34 posted on 01/29/2006 5:32:10 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Although I can surmise as to why the Bush admin may wish to not dwell on this, (intel., disclosure of info., etc) and I'm not so gullible as to believe Saddam didn't have WMDs.
I'm also reluctant to jump up 'n down and shout, 'They had 'em. they had 'em! They moved 'em to Syria!', a/c of prev White House and Presidential admissions that these weapons weren't there and they were mistaken about them for various reasons.

All of this, in the grand scheme of things will matter only after GWB is well retired.
What matters now, I believe, is focusing on keeping the White House free of insidious pests...whether they be liberal, Democrat, or even Republican.

This is why I advocate a positive approach to the nomination and election of our President on '08. And a "positive approach" is defined as propagating the benefits of a conservative agenda and one who will wholeheartedly and sincerely carry that agenda out to the best of his/her means.

35 posted on 01/29/2006 6:53:29 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Delmarksman; AnAmericanMother

important nexus....


36 posted on 01/30/2006 4:40:40 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: marta R

No suprise to anyone but Cindy Sheehan and the rest of the disinformed Democrat rank and file.


37 posted on 01/30/2006 4:48:42 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


38 posted on 01/30/2006 5:02:18 AM PST by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eleni121; doug from upland



'indicting hillary'
Would that they will. Finally....

 

Hillary in Aviary
 
 
by Mia T, November 2000, sometime before "the first Tuesday after the first Monday"



"Bird of paradise" would have been a brilliant wrong answer for the New-York-state-bird question; in one fell swoop it would have flattered the necessary constituency, rendered hillary's cheating marginally believable and suggested a quick, secure, creative mind.

But the obsessively perfectionistic dodo wasn't able to fake even one wrong answer in the Letterman phony "pop quiz," a nostalgic electuary of "Twenty-One" fraud and (Groucho) Marxist left-wing crow.

Instead, this documented incompetent with no apparent creative or analytic (not to mention thespian) skills gushed forth with a lame--"It's the bluebird--I know that" --globally exposing herself to be the corrupt clown that the sentient among us already know she is.

It is no accident--and the Sheehy hagiography notwithstanding, it is certainly not because of any patriarchal society--that this reflexive kleptocrat never sought office. She never ran simply because she is a perfectionist and an incompetent who cannot tolerate personal (as opposed to bill-related) criticism, witness the prescreened, heavily controlled, sycophantic crowds, her pre-programmed, totally scripted appearances (or, alternatively, her totally mute "listening tour"), her unavailability to the press, indeed, her "bluebird."

Thus, the question begging to be asked is this:

Why would this compulsively perfectionistic grotesquerie allow herself to be unambiguously exposed as the utter incompetent and fraud and fool and horror that she is?

And why would this self-proclaimed protector of "the children" prolong her own child's profound trauma by forcing her own bottom-heavy self, soiled in its own right, onto the political stage?

The answer, I believe, resides more in liberty loss than in power gain.

Simply put, she is not running for office; she is running from indictment.

And I fear Starr successor, Robert Ray, is unable to catch her...
Or catch on.

On second thought, maybe the problem is that he does....

Ray's recent statement , " I have been charged with responsibly conducting the work of this office. Some of my responsibility is to ensure that there is no untoward effect on the political process," both confirms and encourages this latest round of clinton raping, pillaging, despoiling, destroying.

Will this nightmare never end?


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2000, 2005



(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

Clinton Administration Veteran:
"Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life."


My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president.

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics, Berkeley
clinton Administration veteran

Hillary Clinton?
Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man?


Thank you, Gavin McNett, for your tribute to the incomparable Tammy Wynette. (TAMMY WYNETTE, 1942-1998)

Too many pundits, usually leftist and privileged, sneer at country music. To these critics, any music created by poor, Southern whites (at least those poor, Southern whites who didn't attend an Ivy League university) must be held in contempt, along with its correlatives: incest, racism and trailer parks.

Hillary Clinton? Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man? Where would she be now if she as a child had to pick cotton from sun up to sun down?

Tammy Wynette stands alone, a legend; and she will be admired wherever people appreciate the honesty of the human experience. Human beings are vulnerable. We all should be thankful to any artist courageous enough to bare her soul on the public stage so the rest of us who are listening and know whereof she speaks might benefit.


READ MORE

hillary's vaccine shortage, the avian flu, pandemic, terrorism, hillary clinton, bill clinton, bird flu

IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY
by Mia T, 11.14.05

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006


39 posted on 01/30/2006 6:01:21 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Spot on Mia!

During the leadup to the Iraq liberation, while a couple hundred thousand young Americans sat in the desert, the corrupt Chiraq/Schroeder/Putin/Crietien/Total/Hans Blix/Colin Powell/Tony Blair-and one pedophile block ran obstruction for Saddan Hussayne.

Hussayne meanwhile, behind that so-corruptly, cynically and useful-idiotically provided cover - and while Mr Bush practiced much compassion and no detectable conservatism - used the Blair-Block provided, American-Soldier-Intensive, breathing, organizing, dispersing, disposing and terrorist-facilitating space to good advantage.

Just as I and countless others, with between us scores of years of boots-on-the-ground Arab/Moslem/Iraq experience, passionately protested on these boards at the time that he would!

Blessings - Brian


40 posted on 01/30/2006 6:04:31 AM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla

I believe if you look at most recent comments coming from the WH, you will find that logic prevails, i.e., "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."

The contrariwise argument concerning the failure to find Saddam's WMDs can only be pure demagoguery. (At some point, the WH succumbed to the leftist demagogues and their useful idiots in the press, but it has since reestablished its logical footing.)

Positive and negative approaches are not mutually exclusive. Why can't we both field a strong candidate AND expose the danger of the left? Indeed, I would argue that we must do both.


41 posted on 01/30/2006 6:21:11 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

http://www.intelligencesummit.org/


42 posted on 01/30/2006 6:28:02 AM PST by jetson (throne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

Saddam cleverly complied with the Bush Doctrine, i.e., he acted before the threat was imminent...

He was aided and abetted, of course, by the delay tactics of the American Left and by that self-styled if seditious modern-day Paul Revere-wannabe, Sen. Jay Rockefeller....

Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late.

State of the Union Address by President George W. Bush
The U.S. Capitol
January 28, 2003


43 posted on 01/30/2006 7:41:52 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

BTTT!


44 posted on 01/30/2006 7:43:10 AM PST by The Mayor ( Check out my new Blog http://albanysinsanity.speakupwny.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor

thx :)


45 posted on 01/30/2006 7:44:46 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jetson

thx for the link.


46 posted on 01/30/2006 7:48:02 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Clinton Administration Veteran: "Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life." ======================================================================

I actually spoke with Brad DeLong. He is at Berkeley. Although he would not go on camera, he stood by his statement.

47 posted on 01/30/2006 7:52:13 AM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

missus clinton's IQ = 3/4PR bump


48 posted on 01/30/2006 8:29:12 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

We'll never convince the true believers, Mia. I hope we can convince the mushy middle.


49 posted on 01/30/2006 8:33:15 AM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

<< Macsmind is reporting that Sen. Rockefeller may be the target of investigators examining the leak of classified information on the NSA surveillance program. >>

That'd be a day long remembered, spoken of in awe - and forever celebrated as a High Holiday!

Sighhhh ...


50 posted on 01/30/2006 8:36:07 AM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson