I wonder how so many creationists actually practice medicine, have PHd.'s in all scientific fields? In your pea-brain, you think one can only understand science if they swear allegience to evolution? Again, why don't you go to your list and post a few of these accusations? Perhaps rather than do document dumps, you can actually hold an in-depth discussion of one issue at a time?
Feel free to go count them if you wish. I do know that they're relatively rare, compared to the percentage in the general population. By and large, "higher learning" and anti-evolution creationism do not go hand in hand. First, AECreationists tend to be antagonistic towards science and science education. Second, many people who *start out* AECreationists end up realizing the error of their position once they start learning enough about the real-world evidence, and stop being AECreationists. Here's one example of many former AECreationists who learned that the AECreationist was bunk -- he is now convinced, by the evidence, of the truth of evolutionary biology. This kind of story is repeated countless times as AECreationists leave the echo-chamber of creationism and start to learn about how science actually works and what the real-world evidence actually is.
In your pea-brain, you think one can only understand science if they swear allegience to evolution?
In your pea-brain, you keep jumping to bizarre conclusions about me. No, that's not what I've said.
Again, why don't you go to your list and post a few of these accusations?
What are you babbling about here? Post *what* accusations?
Perhaps rather than do document dumps, you can actually hold an in-depth discussion of one issue at a time?
Indeed I can, as I've already done in scores of posts on this very thread. Not paying attention, are you?