Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: darbymcgill
I specifically didn't name names or say who was involved in a conspiracy. I only said he was conspired against. I based that statement on this post by js1138. Are you guys calling him a liar?

I see nothing in js1138's post that would suggest any "conspiracy" against gore3000 perpitrated by anyone.
978 posted on 02/03/2006 12:31:15 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 961 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
To: #3Fan Each abuse report and its corresponding post stands on its own. If you think we're gonna hash through hundreds of posts to see "who started it" you're nuts.

The mods started a thread to see who was causing the flame wars, and it turned out to be the creationists.

Then maybe you can tell me which of these conflicting statements is true?
979 posted on 02/03/2006 12:41:01 AM PST by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 978 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
I see nothing in js1138's post that would suggest any "conspiracy" against gore3000 perpitrated by anyone.

I seem to have missed the conspiracy posts. I haven't had time recently to read everything.

I don't see anything interesting enough to merit a response.

986 posted on 02/03/2006 5:02:24 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 978 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio; js1138; Ichneumon; PatrickHenry
I see nothing in js1138's post that would suggest any "conspiracy" against gore3000 perpitrated by anyone.

The only way to construe js1138's post as being indicative of a conspiracy to ban g3k is to interpret it in a manner analogous to claiming that a police investigation into a serial crime is a "conspiracy" to catch the perpetrators. The MODS started a thread and kept an eye on it TO SEE WHO THE "TROUBLE MAKERS" WERE. They found out. The "trouble makers" got banned. There isn't a shred of evidence to suggest the MODS "conspired" against anyone, and even less to suggest that the Evos had any part in a "conspiracy to ban g3k." Such allegations are utter hysterical paranoid ideation.

And, to be precise about it, the MODS setting up that thread isn't what got g3k banned; it was g3k's hysterical reaction to the banning of HIS pals, and wild, ill-advised conspiratorial allegatives and insults he made against JR SUBSEQUENT TO HIS PALS getting banned, that got HIM banned.

In conclusion, your interlocutor is wrong on all counts, and has been since this silly argument started. I have arrived at the conclusion that he is unhinged, and is making wild, irrational, and incoherent allegations....... very much like what got g3k banned.

If he wants to allege that the MODS and JR "conspired" to ban g3k, I can't stop him. But I can predict the consequences of his doing so.....

989 posted on 02/03/2006 7:32:43 AM PST by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 978 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson