Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran hands over documents that may show warhead design
Associated Press ^ | January 31, 2006 - 6:43 am

Posted on 01/31/2006 6:45:50 AM PST by maquiladora

VIENNA, Austria - Iran has given the International Atomic Energy Agency sensitive documents that appear linked to nuclear warhead designs - the latest attempt by Tehran to stave off being reported to the U.N. Security Council, diplomats said Tuesday.

The diplomats told The Associated Press that 1 1/2 pages describing how to cast fissile uranium into the hemispherical shape of warheads were given to IAEA inspectors last week.

At the same time, the U.N. agency presented Iran with intelligence - provided by the United States - that suggests Tehran has been working on nuclear weapons, and asked for its response, said the diplomats, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the information was confidential.

Late last year, inspectors saw the document that apparently showed how to mold highly enriched grade uranium into the core of warheads, and it figured in a November report by IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei.

Initial reports said the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency was given the documents at that time but the diplomats said Friday that Tehran handed them over only last week in a show of cooperation meant to head off increasing international consensus on reporting Iran to the Security Council over suspicions that its nuclear activities might be a cover for developing weapons.

The document was given to Iran by members of the nuclear black market network, the IAEA said in its November report. It showed how to cast "enriched, natural and depleted uranium metal into hemispherical forms."

Separately, U.S. intelligence - revealed last year, based on information found on a laptop computer reportedly smuggled out of Iran - suggested that Tehran's scientists were working on details of nuclear weapons, including missile trajectories and ideal altitudes for exploding warheads.

(Excerpt) Read more at billingsgazette.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran

1 posted on 01/31/2006 6:45:53 AM PST by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

You don't need a warhead to generate electrical power.


2 posted on 01/31/2006 6:47:50 AM PST by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
No question now that Iran is deliberatly forcing a confrontation.

The only thing they haven't done is test the bomb itself.

3 posted on 01/31/2006 6:47:52 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Iran has given the International Atomic Energy Agency sensitive documents that appear linked to nuclear warhead designs

...but kept several copies of the documents for future use.

4 posted on 01/31/2006 6:50:40 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Iran is probably responsible for about $25 of today's $68 crude oil.


5 posted on 01/31/2006 6:51:51 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

Deja Vu Iraq and Saddam -- how he INCREMENTALLY kept giving little tidbits to the fools in the U.N. just to keep them from lowering the hammer on him...how stupid can this body of reprobates be???


6 posted on 01/31/2006 6:52:39 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Iran is probably responsible for about $25 of today's $68 crude oil.
-----
Not to digress, but just look at the reported profits from Exxon/Mobil today --- staggering. B@stards.


7 posted on 01/31/2006 6:54:07 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
1 1/2 pages describing how to...

Yikes!! It could take MONTHS for the U.N. to digest this MASSIVE Document!

8 posted on 01/31/2006 6:56:05 AM PST by C210N (Bush SPYED, Terrorists DIED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

They're a big company and sell lots of stuff. Exxon's per dollar earnings were less and half that of Coke's. The oil industry as a whole did less than 12 percent.


9 posted on 01/31/2006 7:04:18 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Given enough time, I'm sure we'll find out. My guess is we've only seen the half of it, and I'm being generous.


10 posted on 01/31/2006 7:09:09 AM PST by faloi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

There's such a thing as willful stupidity.


11 posted on 01/31/2006 7:10:37 AM PST by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Yeah, but I don't need Coke to get to work. XOM may have had a lower operating margin, but they had a higher return on assets. Your point?


12 posted on 01/31/2006 7:16:47 AM PST by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

Their argument of electrical power was gone a long time ago. If that was truly all they wanted, there's no reason why they wouldn't have gone for an agreement where Russia refines the fuel, provides it to them free, and then removes the spent fuel later. You could easily do that and maintain records guaranteeing that no fuel was diverted for other uses. It would even be significantly cheaper for Iran, too. But their insistence on enriching uranium gives away their ultimate goal...


13 posted on 01/31/2006 7:19:47 AM PST by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eraser2005

I like Exxon/Mobil stock. Wish I'd bought more.


14 posted on 01/31/2006 7:19:52 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Exxon's per dollar earnings were less and half that of Coke's. The oil industry as a whole did less than 12 percent.
------
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/27/business/27cnd-energy.html?ex=1288065600&en=89bb1759293dd8b6&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

As much as I hate the NYT, from them...


15 posted on 01/31/2006 7:21:30 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Iran has given the [IAEA] 1 1/2 pages describing how to cast fissile uranium... ...At the same time, the U.N. agency presented Iran with intelligence - provided by the United States - that suggests Tehran has been working on nuclear weapons...

lol... let me get this straight! Iran essentially tells the UN, "We're designing a bomb". The UN then provides Iran with virtually the same information from an Iranian laptop acquired by the U.S. and says, "Please explain this information". What part of Iran's admission does the UN not get? This is certainly a sitcom, but the punch line is nuclear proliferation and that’s not funny!

16 posted on 01/31/2006 7:28:35 AM PST by humint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

think anyone will accept it?


17 posted on 01/31/2006 7:38:01 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson