To: katieanna
"in one of the most partisan victories in modern history"
ROFLMAO.
This writer must be 12 years old.
HE has NO perspective on what Congress was like with LBJ in Oval Office, or Tip O'Neal etc etc etc.
I guess it's only non-partisan if the Democrats get their way?
13 posted on
01/31/2006 10:33:15 AM PST by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: Blueflag
if this was a demorat nomination the 58-42 vote would be hailed as a non-partisan vote by the moderate republicans
60 posted on
01/31/2006 11:04:37 AM PST by
italianquaker
(Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
To: Blueflag
"in one of the most partisan victories in modern history"
Makes it sound like the victory is tainted. But the reality is that this was partisan in that for the first time, the minority party voted essentially unanimously against a perfectly qualified, minimally-controversial nominee.
66 posted on
01/31/2006 11:14:16 AM PST by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson