Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Killer of 13 is delusional, experts say
Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | Emilie Lounsberry

Posted on 02/01/2006 5:25:23 AM PST by grjr21

Death-row inmate George Emil Banks thinks he's been pardoned by God and is no longer facing execution.

He believes that his lawyers, psychiatrists and prison staff are joined in a wide-ranging conspiracy to get him to renounce God. He thinks that his itchy body rash was the work of flesh-eating demons. And he has blamed his continued incarceration on the "Islamic government of the United States."

That is the delusional world of the convicted mass murderer, according to testimony at yesterday's hearing at Graterford Prison to determine whether he is mentally competent to be executed.

While psychiatrists detailed his deteriorating mental condition, Banks, 63, huddled in a cell adjacent to the hearing room, sometimes covering his head. He sent word that he wanted to skip the afternoon session because he could not hear the proceedings. His lawyers did not object. "Mr. Banks is not with us mentally," one of his lawyers, Billy Nolas, told the judge.

The testimony painted a grim portrait of Banks as a psychotic and delusional prisoner whose mental state has deteriorated since his 1983 trial for the shooting rampage that left 13 people dead, including five of his children, in and around Wilkes-Barre in Luzerne County.

Two psychiatrists and a psychologist testified as defense witnesses that he is so severely mentally ill that he does not comprehend his looming execution or the reasons for the death sentence. Senior Deputy Attorney General Jonelle H. Eshbach contends that Banks is mentally competent, but she was barred from calling an expert who would have supported that view.

After the daylong hearing, Luzerne County Court Judge Michael Conahan said he intended to rule by the end of the month on whether Banks is mentally competent to be executed. Whatever decision he makes is likely to be appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which halted his execution in December 2004 and ordered the competency hearing. A new execution date has not been set.

All three experts testified that, in their opinion, Banks is not mentally competent under the standards set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1986 Florida case of Ford v. Wainwright, which held that the Constitution bars the execution of the insane.

"He has a delusional belief... that he has been pardoned, that his sins have been forgiven, and that he is no longer facing execution, and is awaiting release," psychiatrist John O'Brien testified.

"Does Mr. Banks have a rational grasp of his death sentence?" Nolas asked psychiatrist Richard Dudley Jr.

"No," replied Dudley, who said that when he questioned Banks about his pending execution, Banks told him that he did not think that he will be put to death.

"He said they wouldn't go through with that but may do a fake execution to fake him out to see whether he would denounce God," Dudley said.

The experts said that mental illness has remained a factor as Banks' emotional situation deteriorated over the years. Prison records described a litany of problems: He has tried to commit suicide, gone on hunger strikes, and refused medical and psychiatric treatment.

The experts testified that an array of psychiatric medications failed to stop his delusions, and that his break with reality has been consistent. All three said they did not believe he was faking.

"It's tough to malinger for 10 or 15 years, and his behavior has been consistent," psychologist Jethro Toomer testified.

The state rested without an expert to testify that Banks was competent to be executed.

The judge had barred the testimony of a psychiatrist who was prepared to testify for the state that Banks was mentally competent.

The ruling came after defense lawyers objected that the psychiatrist had spoken with Banks on one occasion outside their presence.

Eshbach had asked for more time to allow a New York psychiatrist to complete an evaluation in the case, but Conahan refused.

"We've been substantially hampered," said Eshbach, who has appealed the issue to the state Supreme Court.

The hearing was held at Graterford, where Banks is on death row, because of uncertainty about his condition.

"I don't even think he knows what's going on," said another of his lawyers, Albert Flora Jr.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: activistjudges; deathpenalty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
The judge had barred the testimony of a psychiatrist who was prepared to testify for the state that Banks was mentally competent

That says it all

1 posted on 02/01/2006 5:25:24 AM PST by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grjr21

Well, hopefully he will soon be beyond all earthly pain and trouble.


2 posted on 02/01/2006 5:31:05 AM PST by WayneM (Remember; "Saturday people first. Sunday people next.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

Heaven knows insanity was disreputable enough, long ago; but now that the lawyers have got to cutting every gallows rope and picking every prison lock with it, it is become a sneaking villainy that ought to hang and keep on hanging its sudden possessors until evil-doers should conclude that the safest plan was to never claim to have it until they came by it legitimately. The very calibre of the people the lawyers most frequently try to save by the insanity subterfuge ought to laugh the plea out of the courts, one would think.

MARK TWAIN


3 posted on 02/01/2006 5:36:42 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (“Don't approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the rear, or a Fool from any side.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

I do truly understand why we don't try people who are mentally incompetent, because they can't defend themselves. I understand why we don't convict people who were mentally incompetent when they committed a crime, because they didn't understand that their actions were wrong.

But I just don't understand why we can't execute a person simply because they go crazy in prison.


4 posted on 02/01/2006 5:36:55 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21; MAK1179; briansb
"...whether he is mentally competent to be executed."

That combination of words simply does not seem to make any sense to me......

Kill him and be done with it

5 posted on 02/01/2006 5:39:11 AM PST by Lloyd227 (and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21
The judge had barred the testimony of a psychiatrist who was prepared to testify for the state that Banks was mentally competent

That says it all

It says that this judge is competent and courageous. A psychiatrists who believes that itchy body rash can be the work of flesh-eating demons is a very strange psychiatrist.

6 posted on 02/01/2006 5:40:30 AM PST by A. Pole (" There is no other god but Free Market, and Adam Smith is his prophet ! Bazaar Akbar! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21
Two psychiatrists and a psychologist testified as defense witnesses that he is so severely mentally ill that he does not comprehend his looming execution or the reasons for the death sentence.

Tough noogies.

He had it together enough to load, aim and fire a weapon and kill THIRTEEN people.

All three experts testified that, in their opinion, Banks is not mentally competent under the standards set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1986 Florida case of Ford v. Wainwright, which held that the Constitution bars the execution of the insane.

BS!

The Constitution says no such thing.

I'm SO sick of these animals getting a free ride for life on the taxpayer's back because they were too young or crazy to 'know what they were doing'

They DID IT!

That's all that should matter.

7 posted on 02/01/2006 5:41:21 AM PST by MamaTexan (I am NOT a ~legal entity~, nor am I a *person* as created by law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lloyd227
"...whether he is mentally competent to be executed."

The only way to be sure is to kill him and then ask if he understood what just happened.
8 posted on 02/01/2006 5:42:51 AM PST by jrg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

1983 trial...and this scum and his lawyers are still sucking up taxpayer dollars out of PA's pathetic injustice system! There is absolutely no excuse why a mass murderer of 13 should be using oxygen that a good rat could use TWENTY-FOUR years after his killing spree. PA is guilty of gross incompetence in this case for not dispatching this vermin at least fifteen years ago.


9 posted on 02/01/2006 5:42:59 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

What about the possibility that he is 'faking it' to avoid a death penalty?


10 posted on 02/01/2006 5:43:38 AM PST by sportutegrl (People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grjr21
The only thing that matters is that the executioner is competent and sane.
11 posted on 02/01/2006 5:44:55 AM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
A psychiatrists who believes that itchy body rash can be the work of flesh-eating demons is a very strange psychiatrist.

"psychologist Jethro Toomer testified."


Yes but what if his name is Jethro
12 posted on 02/01/2006 5:47:10 AM PST by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl
What about the possibility that he is 'faking it' to avoid a death penalty?

There is a such a possibility, but I know about too many prosecutors and prosecution "experts" willing to fake evidence and to ignore EVIDENT mental illness.

I would rather bet that judge knows what is he doing. We still have the courts run by judges and not by prosecutors.

13 posted on 02/01/2006 5:50:26 AM PST by A. Pole (The freemarketeers are economic men, greedy, rational and controlled by the invisible hand market.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

It's an outrage that this guy has been on death row since 1983! 22 years!! If they'd killed him 20 yrs ago, they wouldn't have this dilemma.


14 posted on 02/01/2006 5:55:04 AM PST by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

If someone cannot be held accountable for his actions, then he is unfit to walk in society ever without a legal guardian who WILL be held accountable for not keeping a beast under control.


15 posted on 02/01/2006 5:59:57 AM PST by weegee (Happy Holidays! Tis the season of MLK, Chinese New Year, Tet, Valentine's, Presidents...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

What does being mentally competant have to do with anything? So if they are a nutjob, we have to support their nutjob selves for another 50 years? BS. Even more reason to remove them and their delusional selves from the earth. Hell, the left support euthanizing the mentally handicapped (Terri Schiavo), why not the ones who are mentally handicapped enough to murder 13 innocent people?

Hypocrites.


16 posted on 02/01/2006 6:51:55 AM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I do truly understand why we don't try people who are mentally incompetent, because they can't defend themselves. I understand why we don't convict people who were mentally incompetent when they committed a crime, because they didn't understand that their actions were wrong.

While I respect your compassion, I disagree..

The test has to be "Danger to Others"..
Frankly, I could care less about "Danger to Self"..

I don't care what the mental competence of a murderer or any other violent criminal is..
Their Actions are what is relevent..
If they cause the deaths of innocents, then they should be dealt with accordingly..
A dead criminal will never kill again..

17 posted on 02/01/2006 6:53:54 AM PST by Drammach (In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

Even kids know how to play crazy so their parents can get them Riddlin(sp).


18 posted on 02/01/2006 6:54:54 AM PST by countorlock (But thy strong Hours indignant work'd their wills, And beat me down and marr'd and wasted me,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

>>>A psychiatrists who believes that itchy body rash can be the work of flesh-eating demons is a very strange psychiatrist.>>>

Of course, because people who are looking at execution couldn't or wouldn't ever LIE or create an act to avoid said execution. Yes, you and the judge would know just because this fella says he has been attacked by flesh eating demons, that he is mentally incompetent, whereas the psychiatrist who is TRAINED and SCHOOLED to recognize people trying to fool the mental health community is just a fool.

Right?


19 posted on 02/01/2006 6:58:37 AM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sandbar
You must have been posting while I was still typing my response.. LOL..

The "social democrat" Left will continue to try to destroy our legal system and the death penalty only until they are able to seize power of the government and the means of enforcing their own leftist ideals..
There will then be a sudden "about face" and you will see executions like never before..
And for a lot less than murder.. ( like political belief )

20 posted on 02/01/2006 6:59:23 AM PST by Drammach (In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson