To: Gopher Broke
I posted this on another thread earlier when it first happened
Sorry but that is just wrong.Wearing a t shirt is protected by the first amendment and its just as wrong to arrest her for that as it was for Clinton to have FReeper arrested for holding signs up as clintons motorcade passed by and for having those two protesters arrested for saying you suck.
I voted no on the poll btw
30 posted on
02/01/2006 6:28:31 AM PST by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: freepatriot32
Wearing a t shirt is protected by the first amendment ...
Didn't you get the memo? It's only free speech when it doesn't contradict government policy. Just ask any "conservative" here.
Of course, that changes when the Democrats are in charge.
35 posted on
02/01/2006 6:38:42 AM PST by
sheltonmac
(QUIS CUSTODIET IPSOS CUSTODES)
To: freepatriot32
She started to get VOCAL. It wasn't her T-Shirt.
"Thus far, only the Washington Post has revealed, She was also vocal, said U.S. Capitol Police Chief Terrance W. Gainer, and after she ignored instructions to close her jacket and quiet down, she was led out and arrested. Demonstrating in the House gallery is prohibited. (Emphasis added.)"
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21133
The truth is not just the T-Shirt. She opened her mouth prematurely, as she was clearly there to heckle the POTUS, and wrecked Code Pinks's plans.
To: freepatriot32
If a Freeper held up a political protest sign while the president was making the State of The Union Speech, they'd be removed, too. This is a rule of the chamber, attendance is by invitation only. Outside, no problemo.
45 posted on
02/01/2006 7:04:23 AM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: freepatriot32
I posted this on another thread earlier when it first happened Sorry but that is just wrong.Wearing a t shirt is protected by the first amendment and its just as wrong to arrest her for that as it was for Clinton to have FReeper arrested for holding signs up as clintons motorcade passed by and for having those two protesters arrested for saying you suck.
I am a libertarian and i voted yes here. The capitol building has laws against demonstrations taking place inside the building and they should be followed. If she wants to demonstrate, she can step outside with the other pot and pan garage bands.
i just dont see how it was a violation of her rights if she was breaking the law.
To: freepatriot32
We have laws against protesting in the House chamber. It's one of the many differences between the USA and a Banana Republic. Perhaps you'd like to see a SOTU with moonbats screaming, waving signs and stripping naked for "peace" in the Gallery?
54 posted on
02/01/2006 10:11:09 AM PST by
jess35
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson