Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
I agree with your sentiment, but it's not appeasement - it's a feint, a deflection. As you well know, the gay lobby has sizeable funds and a kennel of media lapdogs to broadcast any hint of indiscretion on our part. It's called spin, and they've become very good at it - our job is to minimize whats availible to be spun into propaganda for them. Appeasement would require a real concession on our part - this is not one. It's more of a way to minimize spin while still preventing them from gaining any real ground.

I can appreciate that you have a more idealistic view of how we should handle this, but I think more in terms of a kind of realpolitik - sometimes, the inconsequential loses out when you're dealing with a foe as underhanded as these people can be.

106 posted on 02/02/2006 11:11:56 PM PST by Haemo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Haemo

Nonsense. What you're espousing is doublespeak. Give in to their demands so they don't get angry and demand more.

Total, unadulterated appeasement and support of the "gay" agenda.


109 posted on 02/02/2006 11:17:19 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson