Hmmm, well, perhaps you would mind enlightening us, as opposed to spouting off content-less one-liners, no? If it's so blatantly obvious, then it's remarkable no one has posted anything to back up her claims in light of my criticism.
Besides, you attacked the author of this article before you attacked hollyweird. What happened to all that? Did you realize your position and hers followed the same path, or is it the conversation itself that entices you?
I stand by my original attack on her poorly reasoned and pointless piece of writing, and for the reasons I have repeatedly argued. It just so happens that most of my reasons behind my opinion of her happen to be related to the deplorable state of Hollywood - I attacked Hollywood in an effort to clairify why she's so wrongheaded in her argument.