Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Majority of New Yorkers support Wal-Mart: poll
NewYorkBusiness.com ^ | 2/3/06

Posted on 02/04/2006 8:42:30 AM PST by LdSentinal

A slim 51% majority of New Yorkers support the opening of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. in the city, according to a poll released Friday.

A new Quinnipiac University poll found that 74% of city voters agree that Wal-Mart’s lower prices hurt smaller businesses. Yet 70% agreed that the low prices benefit people who shop there.

Forty-six percent said Wal-Mart should be allowed to open only if it allows workers to unionize. Still, 65% -- including 63% among voters from union households -- said that they would shop at Wal-Mart if one opened near them.

“New Yorkers sympathize with the plight of their fellow workers and their local mom and pop stores, but a bargain is a bargain,” said Quinnipiac Poll Director Douglas Schwartz, in a statement.

Wal-Mart has tried for years to open in the New York City market but faces opposition from city officials and labor leaders who say the retailer provides insufficient pay and health benefits.

From Jan. 25 to 30, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,072 New York City registered voters, with a +/- 3% margin of error.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: capitalism; freedom; hardwork; hillary; nyc; poll; quinnipiac; walmart

1 posted on 02/04/2006 8:42:33 AM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Walmart and it's low prices are not the problem. The problem is with our governments taxing the working people too much and handing the money off to the free-loaders in the country. If the free-loaders were forced to work, we wouldn't have a need for "cheap imports". We have been digging our own grave for several decades - since the "great society" era - I think.

This might seem off topic, but look at the New Orleans fiasco. Nagin is begging for the residents to come back to N.O. The people are too sorry to move out of the FEMA (U.S. tax dollar) paid for motel rooms and rebuild their own DAMN city. Pathetic! Nations have always imported goods. What has changed is that the imports used to be expensive luxury goods - not - stuff that any idiot could produce.

2 posted on 02/04/2006 8:52:00 AM PST by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
LOL poll sch-molls the unions buy the city council and the congress, the people be damned.
3 posted on 02/04/2006 8:57:10 AM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

This is a fascinating debate which would evaporate completely if people understood Econ 101. With respect to imports, try to understand that we export our expensive things in as much as other countries have any money. If, on the other hand, we don't buy what they have, they will migrate and move in next door to you.


4 posted on 02/04/2006 9:36:13 AM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Still, 65% -- including 63% among voters from union households -- said that they would shop at Wal-Mart if one opened near them.

Word up!

5 posted on 02/04/2006 9:40:51 AM PST by Wheee The People
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Wal-Mart is not the enemy, UNIONS are!


6 posted on 02/04/2006 9:50:03 AM PST by JOE43270 (JOE43270, God Bless America and All Who Have and Will Defend Her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Paleese. If Wal Mart was unionized no one would give a damn about the mom and pops or the so-called "effect it is having on the economy".


7 posted on 02/04/2006 10:05:20 AM PST by synbad600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wheee The People

Well to be frank, the union members don't control the union leaders.


8 posted on 02/04/2006 10:11:39 AM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: winston2
I agree with you in principle, but New Orleans my be a poor example.

If I lived in N.O before Kathrina, I would not move to back to N.O. until the levee system was fixed.

I still would be out of the FEMA home/trailer/hotel ASAP.

9 posted on 02/04/2006 10:26:31 AM PST by Popman ("What I was doing wasn't living, it was dying. I really think God had better plans for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson