I think the article also does an excellent job of pointing out that there is all this talk about a theocracy in America (completely ridiculous) but obviously people have not seen what a real theocracy can look like.
BTW, read the whole article, I only posted an excerpt out of consideration for space...but it's really a pretty interesting piece...
Secular humanists will start recognizing that the real danger is radical Islam rather than Christianity? I doubt it.
Muslims eschew all things nontheocratic. "Render unto Caesar" can't happen in Teheran since Caesar is Islam. Public relations is for pigs and jews and christians. Someday the secular world will get the drift. Until then - we are doomed to be javelin catchers due to the stupidity of liberals and their policies of appeasement.
The "monsters" can be
disposed of with one phone call
to a plane like this . . .
The cartoon of the Imam with the bomb in his turban was published well over a year or more ago and e-mailed around the world no one did anything but laugh. Now the ground swell of indignation from Muslims and the inevitable pandering to the childish whininess from politicians like Jack Straw and Barbara Boxer. The Muslims started this conflict some ten years ago and when the going gets tough they squeal like the pigs they are and demand all bow to their views or perish. Tyrants and radicals have always used this recipe to create disorder, a true tempest in a tea pot.
If a cartoon can upset these vile militants it tells you one thing AND IT IS THIS:
First, the timing is perfect. The latest issue of Rolling Stone depicts rapper Kanye West as a Christ-like figure in a crown of thorns with the title: The Passion of Kanye West. The cover shot is a disgusting affront to Christians, and certainly as blasphemous as the cartoons were to Muslims.
As a result, no one was surprised when Christians firebombed Rolling Stone headquarters in New York.
Oh wait, didnt happen.
Okay, well no one was surprised when Christians threatened to firebomb the building.
Nope, didnt happen either.
Rarely does history provide such a perfect point of comparison, and the contrasting responses could hardly be more telling: When faced with a nearly identical situation, one faith resorted to violence, threats and rage like unruly savages; the other was civil, responding (if at all) with letters to the editor, calls for a boycott and many public denunciations.
Second, the rage of the Muslim world again lays bare radicalism for all the world to see. A similar fervor was set off in 2005 in response to purported Koran desecration at Guantanamo Bay. People died then, many of them Muslims. But it didnt matter. The rage is as overwhelming as it is contagious.
Victor Davis Hanson has called this the lunacy principle, that is, these people are capable of doing anything at anytime."
It always amazes me the lefts total lack of understanding of from where and why our freedoms in America came into being. Just as islam underpins islamic countries repressive societies, it is Christianity that founded and under pins our freedoms without it our freedoms will not last. All it takes is just a little reading of our founders writings to understand Christianity's role in our founding of basic rights.
I read a quote the other day, where an enraged muslim screeched, "We will redeem our prophet, Muhammad, with our blood!" Quote is here
As a Christian, I found that quote fascinating. My God has redeemed me with His blood. I don't need to protect Him; He protects me.
Oh, puh-leeze. There is nothing in the least offensive, let along blasphemous, in some guy costuming himself to look like Jesus.
It is useful to examine the actual reasons why Christendom has outgrown this sort of barbarism (basically, the theocratic faction was defeated and marginalized to the point where it is now confined to a handful of Fred Phelps types) while the Islamic world still has so far to go in this respect. Bringing up nonsensical "parallels" does nothing to advance such understanding.