[Ma3lst0rm]

The WMD question is one that has the potential to seal the doom of Democrats. I'm sure the Bush administration has more than enough ammo to sink them the question is why haven't they did it yet? It may be shrewd calculation or it might be because they don't want to be forced to deal with Syria yet. I'd be wary if I were the left, the trap has been set.

[rodguy911]

You just asked the $64,000 question, lots of us would like to know why. As well as the border, the budget a few other out of character things we have been doing. I support GW 1,000% but sooner or later you have to face up to reality on some issues.

[bcsco]

"The WMD question is one that has the potential to seal the doom of Democrats. I'm sure the Bush administration has more than enough ammo to sink them the question is why haven't they did it yet? It may be shrewd calculation or it might be because they don't want to be forced to deal with Syria yet. I'd be wary if I were the left, the trap has been set."

Let me pose another possibility. We have a 2 party system. This would sink the Dimocrats. The President has renewed his call for bipartisanship cooperation. Is he simply giving the Dims one more opportunity to return to the table as a viable opposition party?

I, for one, would prefer to continue our 2 party system (as long as they're both pro American and only disagree on substance) instead of having one strong and several very weak parties. If the President should share such an opinion, I could see he using this as one final opportunity to bring reason to the table; especially since there's a unique possibility that this damning evidence will come to the public soon.

I know, why give the Dims the chance to reform? There's something to be said in that regard, but I still believe two strong National parties that are founded on a love for America is our best bet.

[thoughtomator]

Could be that the President has an old-school sense of responsbility about keeping live intel a secret.

[Hetty_Fauxvert]

It may be shrewd calculation or it might be because they don't want to be forced to deal with Syria yet.

Yup, I've thought this was a possibility for some time. Suppose we locate those WMD in Syria ... what then? Will they turn them over nicely? Don't think so. We startin' another war over them? Well, we kind of have our hands full already. A dilemma, indeed.

[angcat]

I believe it also has allot to do with National Security. Why spill the beans now. I'm just guessing but I know (guess) Bush has information that will put these bastards in the shitter soon. I hope that Reverend crap face also has his day.