Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElectricStrawberry
You have the bottom line right....MONEY....and every plan to make the use of our natural assets with new stringent environmental attachments results in higher consumer prices and ultimately less consumption of other USA goods.

That drives us to buy the cheap "cra*" coming out of China or the "no taste" vegies coming from Mexico and South America.

It's a "no gain" for the USA. The trade deficient, the overlapping social programs and the dependency on FOREIGN oil are the three problems which need fixing. Fixing those problems would change the flow of money and those necessary programs for the poor and hungry will benefit along with providing new jobs.

The Dems refuse to a meeting of the minds on any of them. Their voters are after all, the Unions, social program benefactors, the Eniro Nazis and "women"....the base that gave Bubba his win. IMHO

20 posted on 02/07/2006 10:34:34 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

I'm more thinking of the GW argument as put forth by "scientists" performing non-blind "research" that perpetuate the manmade GW myth, in part, to get more funding to do more research to perpetuate the myth to get more funding.....

...but you're spot on per the aspects of the economic impacts.


21 posted on 02/07/2006 10:41:32 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years....Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson