Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2006 7:42:21 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; coteblanche; Ryle; albertabound; mitchbert; ...

-


2 posted on 02/08/2006 7:43:06 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive

thank goodness. 14 was really bugging me!!! AND i hope they really do crack down on people who commit crimes with a gun. automatic double sentence? that sound fair to you? and i hope STIFFER sentences!!


3 posted on 02/08/2006 7:47:47 AM PST by ferri (Be Politically Incorrect: Support the Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Interesting thing about liberal philosophy, they want "Big Momma Government" to protect every one from just about everything - but have a number of curious exceptions, one being their view that children should not be protected from sexual predators.

I don't wish to automatically conclude that their group is infested by pedophiles but there certainly is a curious connection.

Glad to know that the Tories might be pushing that bar back a little, however, 14/16 is still very young.

5 posted on 02/08/2006 7:59:54 AM PST by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
About frickin time, eh?
7 posted on 02/08/2006 8:19:42 AM PST by CaptainCanada (The Canadian electorate has decided not to perpetuate foolishness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive

How long was the age of consent 14, is it a throwback to the old pioneer days when people married and died at a young age.


8 posted on 02/08/2006 8:21:36 AM PST by tonycavanagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
"One of the issues I would like to see brought forward as quickly as possible is the age of protection, raising that from 14 to 16, and looking at bringing in a close-in-age exemption," Toews said.

So it would be perfectly legal for a 40 year old man to have sex with a 16 year old?

12 posted on 02/08/2006 8:42:48 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive

Only the Liberals would think 14 is an acceptable age of consent.


15 posted on 02/08/2006 9:00:09 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive

Canada: "We're #1 at being just north of the United States!"


19 posted on 02/08/2006 9:15:52 AM PST by Ignatz (Freeper cyborg: "The lay teachers could not make hands of some girls.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; MillerCreek

FYI.


24 posted on 02/08/2006 11:35:04 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive

This law needs to be dome and I support it, but whaat I don't get is why is this the very first thing that the Conservatives are doing.... Is it THAT urgent? Someone very powerful must have had a daughter with an older boyfriend......


40 posted on 02/09/2006 7:48:19 PM PST by rasblue (Everyone has their price)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson