Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MJY1288

Appeals panel rejects secret court's limits on terrorist wiretaps
From Terry Frieden
CNN
Tuesday, November 19, 2002 Posted: 1:24 AM EST (0624 GMT)WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The United States has broad authority to use wiretaps and other surveillance techniques to hunt for suspected terrorists, a federal appeals court panel ruled Monday.

In a 56-page opinion overturning a May decision by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the three-judge panel said the expanded wiretap guidelines sought by Attorney General John Ashcroft under the new USA Patriot Act law do not violate the Constitution. (More on the USA Patriot Act)

The ruling by the special panel from the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia gives broad surveillance authority to counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism investigators to track individuals considered potential national security threats.

"Our case may well involve the most serious threat our country faces," the panel declared.

The reversal of May's decision by a federal judge represents a victory for the Justice Department and the FBI, which were harshly criticized by the lower court judge for its handling of wiretap applications, and their interpretation of the authority granted the government by the USA Patriot Act.


http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/11/18/spy.court.ruling/


8 posted on 02/08/2006 7:45:14 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

Great find Howlin, That should be used in the next hearing when Russ Feingold starts calling this program illegal. The Democrats are really digging a hole they can't get out of on this issue


20 posted on 02/08/2006 7:50:07 PM PST by MJY1288 (THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

isn't janice rogers brown on that court now?


31 posted on 02/08/2006 7:55:59 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

Thanks for that info re: appeals court.


38 posted on 02/08/2006 7:58:23 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

Bump and good


45 posted on 02/08/2006 8:01:06 PM PST by griffin (Love Jesus, No Fear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
"The ruling represents a setback to the American Civil Liberties Union and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, which had filed briefs opposing the government's position, but there was no immediate decision whether the case would be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court"

Also represents a big set back to the Democrats....good find Howlin!

52 posted on 02/08/2006 8:08:48 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

bttt


59 posted on 02/08/2006 8:14:48 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

Excellent work, Howlin!! Bookmarked, saved, and a hugh BTTT!


70 posted on 02/08/2006 8:47:23 PM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson