Would that include ignoring one telling you there is a bear trap where you are stepping? What are your standards on credible advice? Limited only to female topics, ages of consent and free speech, by the groups you mention respectively? 
Posted on 02/10/2006 10:01:03 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
Of course you are right.
He supports the socialist, Louis Farrakhan supporting anti-semite for President.
I read it on WND, just did a Dogpile search and he announced this all over the place.
"why does Pat have his supporters on this forum?"
He was/is also against going to war in Iraq. His followers may well have stuff in common with the opposition. But, I find he's a lot like Mr. Magoo in more than features.
Shapiro is not alone in screaming anti-semite when it comes to Paddy.
Link for Buchanan calling for Bush impeachment August 31, 2005.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46062
And he got Joseph Farah to agree Feb 10, 2006, so I won't support WND.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46062
This helps the enemy no end.
Hitler loved his mom, Mendelssohn, and dogs.
I guess we can concentrate on that rather than all the other stuff we know about him.
He's happy to oblige.
Huh?
She and Pat were perfect together.
Buchanan has insisted that there is no way the German's could have killed the jews in the gas chambers because 'his' numbers disproved the fact.
OOPPSS...kicked out of her party for HER virulent anti semitic rantings.
I'm not at all familiar with the writings of Shapiro, although I do catch Buchanan's performances on The McLaughlin Group. It's interesting how often Pat can agree with the conclusions of Elinor Clift, but for entirely different reasons.
And it's unfortunate that he has been propped up as a standard bearer for paleo-conservatism because the negative aspects of his writings and personal philosophy are used to portray all paleocons in a bad light.
The poor schmuck fell out of a guard tower...
ROFLMAO!!!
Pat once said that "the far right and far left are natural allies" or something to that effect.
Everyone uses the hate word just way too easily. A person can be against your ideas for many reasons without hating you. Maybe Buchanan hates Jews. I just don't know.
Would that include ignoring one telling you there is a bear trap where you are stepping? What are your standards on credible advice? Limited only to female topics, ages of consent and free speech, by the groups you mention respectively?
The author has utterly discredited himself on this one. Buchanan has made a very compelling case that World War II was a defeat -- for the BRITISH. And as supporting evidence he points to the long-term economic malaise in Great Britain and end of British colonial dominance that became the recurring theme of the latter half of the 20th Century.
Utter B.S. The United States was effectively at war with Germany long before Germany declared war on the U.S. I cite the Lend-Lease Act (passed in March of 1941) and the use of U.S. naval vessels to escort British merchant ships in the North Atlantic in 1940-41 as evidence of this.
Sad, but true.
You can concentrate on whatever you like. I just find it facinating that people will hate a person for one mindset in one area and automatically discredit their opinions in all other areas.
I get odd comments from them while exploring their occlusion in detail, like here, for example.
Let me guess: you were one of the people sending him hate mail, weren't you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.