Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fabrizio
"Opponents of the bill were unsuccessful in trying to include exemptions for rape and incest and to protect the health of the mother."

Good grief! They couldn't even get an exception for the health of the mother????? What reasonable person would object to that?
6 posted on 02/10/2006 5:12:47 PM PST by Nathan Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nathan Jr.
They couldn't even get an exception for the health of the mother????? What reasonable person would object to that?

Because in the bizarre language of the pro-abortionist, "health" means whatever the MOTHER wants it to mean at the time. Hope you were using sarcasm.

7 posted on 02/10/2006 5:35:20 PM PST by fwdude (Prohibition--->Taboo--->Tolerance--->Acceptance--->Mandate--->Enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Jr.
A woman's health also pertains to her mental health...ie depression, anxiety, nervousness, or whatever symptom she felt like claiming to be rid of the child.
11 posted on 02/10/2006 5:45:36 PM PST by nitzy (Conservatives instill values into their children, Liberals inject saline into theirs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Jr.

>>>Good grief! They couldn't even get an exception for the health of the mother????? What reasonable person would object to that?>>>

I agree, most here and pro-lifers (as I am) would argue that the doctor would CLAIM that the health of the mother would even be 'mental' health, but even that is better than free for all random birth control abortion. By minors even.


14 posted on 02/10/2006 5:55:11 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson