Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bob Barr, Bane of the Right? (WaPo from CPAC)
Washington Post ^ | 2/11/06 | Dana Milbank

Posted on 02/11/2006 12:22:17 AM PST by conservative in nyc

You could find just about everything at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference this week: the bumper sticker that says "Happiness is Hillary's face on a milk carton," the "Straight Pride" T-shirt, a ride on an F-22 Raptor simulator at the Lockheed exhibit, and beans from the Contra Cafe coffee company (slogan: "Wake up with freedom fighters").

As of midday yesterday, a silent auction netted $300 for lunch with activist Grover Norquist, $275 for a meal with the Heritage Foundation president and $1,000 for a hunting trip with the American Conservative Union chairman. But lunch with former congressman Bob Barr (R-Ga.), with an "estimated value" of $500, had a top bid of only $75 -- even with a signed copy of Barr's book, "The Meaning of Is," thrown in.

No surprise there. The former Clinton impeachment manager is the skunk at CPAC's party this year. He says President Bush is breaking the law by eavesdropping on U.S. citizens without warrants. And fellow conservatives, for the most part, don't want to hear it.

--Snip--

"Are we losing our lodestar, which is the Bill of Rights?" Barr beseeched the several hundred conservatives at the Omni Shoreham in Woodley Park. "Are we in danger of putting allegiance to party ahead of allegiance to principle?"

Barr answered in the affirmative. "Do we truly remain a society that believes that ... every president must abide by the law of this country?" he posed. "I, as a conservative, say yes. I hope you as conservatives say yes."

But nobody said anything in the deathly quiet audience. Barr merited only polite applause when he finished, and one man, Richard Sorcinelli, booed him loudly. "I can't believe I'm in a conservative hall listening to him say [Bush] is off course trying to defend the United States," Sorcinelli fumed.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ariannaindrag; barr; bobbarr; cpac; danamilbank; nsa; spying
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Dana Milbank's take on Bob Barr's CPAC appearance.

Unlike the New York Times, the Washington Post reports that Vice President Cheney was "far more to this crowd's liking" on the Al Qaeda call eavesdropping. The WaPo reports that the crowd was cheering the Vice President.

1 posted on 02/11/2006 12:22:20 AM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Clearly, Bob Barr is a communist. I mean, the WaPo is talking good about him.</sarcasm>
2 posted on 02/11/2006 12:28:24 AM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

I haven't seen any FReeper reports from CPAC as of yet.


3 posted on 02/11/2006 12:30:05 AM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
There are some FReeper reports from CPAC here:
Live from CPAC!
4 posted on 02/11/2006 12:33:43 AM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Bob Barr only poses as a Republican. He needs to move on to MoveOn.org


5 posted on 02/11/2006 12:38:05 AM PST by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

I used to like Bob Barr. I did not even mind him being a liberal on the civil liberties issues. I even swallowed hard when he joined the ACLU. But, the minute I heard that he was going to introduce Gore for a hit piece speech, I said enough.

He will never ever gain a good word from me.


6 posted on 02/11/2006 1:59:48 AM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

I agree. Barr has gone to the dark side.


7 posted on 02/11/2006 2:54:51 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta (There's always a reason to choose life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Barr has lost it. Pitiful.


8 posted on 02/11/2006 3:40:43 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Unfortunately, I think he wants back in elective office so bad he's willing to compromise what we took to be his deeply held beliefs. Guess they weren't so deep.

Another political whore.

9 posted on 02/11/2006 4:03:06 AM PST by WarEagle (This is obviously Karl Rove's fault...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Barr is not a Conservative. He is a covert left-winger who immediately took a job with the anti-American ACLU when he was discharged from Congress. I would not believe anything that Barr says he has made his decision to join the left so we should stop calling him a Conservative and call him what he is a left-wing anti-American.
10 posted on 02/11/2006 4:49:21 AM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YOUGOTIT

The field became too crowded on the right for Barr. He would just be one of hundreds of voices and not a particularly good one. By shifting left he has become unique, a Republican quasi-conservative who now can get on every news show and make a name for himself. The only person he has to share the field with over there is Pat Buchanan.


11 posted on 02/11/2006 6:12:14 AM PST by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
While I respect Barr (or, at least I used to), I would have to admit that he is way off base on this one. You need to be smart enough to pick your battles. This is simply the wrong one. Surveillance of Al Quaeda types during war is not a threat to anybody's civil liberties except for those of terrorists and their enablers - and their liberties sorely need to be threatened.

Barr could have taken an approach that would make him an ACLU iconoclast, stirring up that organization from the inside, by addressing real threats to civil liberties - for example, by taking on the IRS (which is the ultimate threat to our freedoms), by standing up for gun rights, etc. Instead he foolishly gives an introductory speech for Al Gore's nonsense, and jumps on the Al Quaeda/Demo-Commie bandwagon on the faux "domestic surveillance" issue.

12 posted on 02/11/2006 6:31:52 AM PST by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Bob Barr is no more a Conservative then Zell Miller is a Liberal. Unfortunately, he gets called one by the Dinosaur Media so I guess it is true. He can't ride on his Impeachment Manager record forever.


13 posted on 02/11/2006 6:34:15 AM PST by RobFromGa (In decline, the Old Media gets more shrill, thrashing about like a dinosaur caught in the tar pits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WarEagle
Unfortunately, I think he wants back in elective office so bad he's willing to compromise what we took to be his deeply held beliefs. Guess they weren't so deep. Another political whore.

How true! Barr was a Democrat before he changed parties to run for office as a Republican.

14 posted on 02/11/2006 7:38:59 AM PST by HateBill (Democratic Message: "Kiss Terrorist A*s" vs. Republican Message: "Kick Terrorist A*s")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: conservative in nyc

It has to be said. Barr was a Clinton impeachment manager. He obviously respects the rule of law. The law is the law. Conservatives are about, among other things, the unambiguous rule of law. Claiming Al-Queda connections does not excuse illegally wiretapping American citizens. The law has to mean something or the law means nothing, regardless of party. This is about the rule of law and the constitution. Barr is right on the money.


16 posted on 02/12/2006 2:46:43 PM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
You have your asbestos knickers on, do you?

(Here it is over four hours later and the Bushites haven't let you have it yet? I'm impressed!)

17 posted on 02/12/2006 7:54:59 PM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
The once-understood term, "conservative," has over the past five years lost just about all its meaning.

It was much clearer when the Republican party had stalwarts such as Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan to set the course. You could easily tell their commitment to conservative principles simply by listening for the howls from the northeast liberal Republicans (Keating, Javits, Case, Brooke) in response to what they said or did.

These days, anyone who voices opposition to the leader is labeled a liberal, a communist or a traitor by the Republican sheep. It is no longer the same party I once worked in.

18 posted on 02/12/2006 8:07:59 PM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billybudd

Bob Barr is wrong and apparently hasn't studied the Constitution that he once took an oath on.


19 posted on 02/12/2006 8:21:34 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Tagline removed by Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
"You have your asbestos knickers on, do you?"

Oh, you betcha! And not just the knickers... We're talking full body suit here!

20 posted on 02/12/2006 8:41:33 PM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson