Both Clinton appointees look to foreign constitutions and precedents to justify their taking away our rights.
I can only shake in horror thinking what if Gore had carried Florida in '00 and gone on to a second term? Imagine the two appointees he would have made?
Breyer, Ginsburg, Souter, Stevens, and the two new justices would have rewritten the US constitution.
They would have been their own constitutional convention.
And all the while there are 50 states right here under their noses. Both are execrable elitists, unfit to judge others.
Good points. A also note that when these Justices quote foreign "precedents" they only quote those from English speaking sources, even - Heaven help us - Zimbabwe. I guess there are no suitable precedents in Danish or Polish. Incidentally, Poland's Supreme Court has ruled that life begins at conception - an uncongenial notion to Breyer, Ginsburg, Stevens, and Souter.
Yeah, boy, whoooo! I am in WPB, FL and watched the Dem shenanigans up close on local TV too. Our county is so crooked with Dem aholes running the show like the guy who got El Rushbo's dr records illegally for his own political gain, and those Dems insisting we recount.
I never had the first bit of confusion with the socalled confusing butterfly ballots. I just feel in my bones some crooked libs were dicking with the ballots punching extra holes after the fact. We all know that both parties have been involved with voting fraud from our beginnings, but if the 40 yrs of complete Dem rule between 1932-80 isn't proof they primarily have brought it to a high art, I don't know what is. I watch like a hawk whenever I'm at the polls and only wish I could have spent the whole day.
The DNC was already alerting it's lemmings to cry discrimination before the polls even opened. And during the early voting were harrassing Reps standing in line.
Heavan only knows just exactly what depths we would have sunk to had Gore held the reins thru 9/11 and since.