Replies

You are failing to read what I've posted and are beginning to infer that I've said things other posters have said.

So, here's the question for you ~ do you want to send the kid up the river for 30 years, or turn him loose to peddle sugar on the streets?

"You are failing to read what I've posted and are beginning to infer that I've said things other posters have said.

So, here's the question for you ~ do you want to send the kid up the river for 30 years, or turn him loose to peddle sugar on the streets?"

I've read what you posted. You've been twisting and turning and saying you have reason to blame administrators for doing stupid stuff. Maybe so, but does that make what happened here really the administrator's fault, or the kid's? The KID is the one who said he had cocaine.

I don't have a need to see him go up for 30 years, but that is also highly unlikely, as you'd also realize, if you'd stop blasting and think for a moment. And quite frankly, if he starts peddling sugar on the streets, he's too stupid to live, and he WILL get what's coming to him.

I shall be interested in seeing if the DA lets the charges go through to court. If so, they've probably got more evidence than either of us know of. If they get downgraded or dropped, someone was just trying to make a point to a kid who is apparently too stupid to know how dumb what he said really was. I've got a class full of 7th graders right now who probably make this kid look brilliant, so it's not like its a limited phenomena, either. Have a good night.