Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jason_b
It only makes sense when you have women as chattel.

If women are treated as lower humans and not free to get jobs and educations then they will be dependent on men.
34 posted on 02/12/2006 4:02:43 PM PST by DesignerChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: DesignerChick

He was talking about centuries ago. I'm not sure "jobs" was an option for women back then, or men either for that matter. It was a tribal time. Humans are experienced based. Back then, no one had ever contemplated a world without chattel slavery, or women as chattels. It took the English Enlightenment to get the West out of that. Many societies today still labor under the old pre-enlightenment ways, India with its castes, Islam with all its foolishness and treatment of women, China with parents killing girl infants because boys are valued more. What is frustrating is that backward societies seem resistent to enlightened ideas. As if they don't want to improve, or what we see as improvement they do not.


69 posted on 02/13/2006 5:03:19 AM PST by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson