Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researchers Evolve A Complex Genetic Trait In The Laboratory
ScienceDaily ^

Posted on 02/13/2006 5:01:39 PM PST by FlameThrower

Researchers Evolve A Complex Genetic Trait In The Laboratory

Duke University biologists have evolved a complex trait in the laboratory -- using the pressure of selection to induce tobacco hornworms to evolve the dual trait of turning black or green depending on the temperature during their development. The biologists have also demonstrated the basic hormonal mechanism underlying the evolution of such dual traits.

Frederik Nijhout shows the "polyphenic" hornworm he and Yuichiro Suzuki evolved. (Photo Credit: Les Todd)Their experiments, they said, offer important insight into how complex traits involving many genes can abruptly "blossom" in an organism's evolution.

The researchers -- Professor of Biology Frederik Nijhout and graduate student Yuichiro Suzuki -- published their findings in the Feb. 3, 2006, Science. Their work was funded by the National Science Foundation.

The complex traits, or "polyphenisms," they studied are instances in which animals with the same genetic makeup can produce quite different traits, or phenotypes, in different environments. For example, genetically identical ants can develop into queens, soldiers, or workers, according to their early hormonal environment. Or, the same butterfly can assume very different coloration in winter or summer. A kind of polyphenism is also likely at work in mammals -- for example in the seasonal development of antlers or changes in plumage or coat colors, said Nijhout and Suzuki.

While biologists have understood the basic machinery underlying polyphenisms, the mystery remained how such complex traits, which involve mutations in multiple genes, could evolve and persist.

"It's long been known that polyphenisms are controlled by hormones, with the brain sensing environmental signals and altering the pattern of hormonal secretions," said Nijhout. "In turn, these hormonal patterns turn sets of genes on or off to produce different traits. However, we understood only the developmental mechanism, and how it is possible with a single genome in an animal to produce two very different phenotypes," he said.

"There had been theoretical models to explain the evolutionary mechanism -- how selective pressures can maintain polyphenisms in a population, and why they don't converge gradually into one form or another," said Nijhout. "But nobody had ever started with a species that didn't have a polyphenism and generated a brand-new polyphenism. Such a demonstration could offer important insights into the evolutionary mechanism underlying such traits."

In their experiments, Suzuki and Nijhout chose a species of finger-sized tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, which normally produces only green larvae. Because a related species, Manduca quinquemaculata, develops black or green larvae when exposed to lower or higher temperatures, the researchers theorized that they could use temperature shocks to evolve a similar polyphenism in M. sexta.

Suzuki and Nijhout conducted their experiments on a black mutant form of M. sexta, which is black because of lower production of a key hormone called juvenile hormone. They subjected the black mutant caterpillars to heat during a critical period, and over multiple generations selected for two different lines of mutant caterpillars. One polyphenic line was selected to show increased greenness on heat treatment, and one monophenic line selected to show decreased color change upon heat treatment.

After rearing and selecting ten generations of caterpillars, with about 300 caterpillars per generation, the researchers found that they had, indeed, created the two distinct strains. The polyphenic strain would develop a green color at higher temperatures, altering abruptly at a temperature of about 28 degrees C. (83 degrees F.) In contrast, the monophenic strain remained black at all temperatures.

The researchers could compare these strains to understand the origin of the polyphenism. Their experiments revealed that it was the level of juvenile hormone in the caterpillars that regulated whether they would turn black or green.

For example, by applying a spot of juvenile hormone extracted from a green caterpillar to a black caterpillar during a critical period, Suzuki could produce a green spot on that caterpillar.

Also, by tightening a tiny noose around a developing caterpillar's head to prevent the juvenile hormone -- produced in the head -- from flowing to the rest of the body of the heated polyphenic worm, Suzuki could prevent the caterpillar from turning green.

According to Nijhout, the generation of polyphenism in the caterpillar demonstrates an evolutionary phenomenon called "genetic accommodation." In this process, a mutation in a regulatory pathway such as a hormonal pathway changes the hormonal level to bring it closer to a threshold level that could be affected by environmental variation.

Thus, the black mutant hornworm had "dialed-down" levels of juvenile hormone, so that the caterpillar's color-producing machinery would be more likely to be affected by temperature. By selecting for a temperature-sensitive strain, the researchers established polyphenism in the caterpillar.

"Our work is really the first demonstration that genetic accommodation actually can happen," said Nijhout. "In this case, it happens in the laboratory by artificial selection; but as with all such experiments, we assume that this is a microcosm of what is actually going on in nature."

Nijhout theorized that such "homeostatic" mechanisms that maintain, for example, the color of a caterpillar, can act to mask a great deal of mutations present within the genetic machinery.

"Homeostatic mechanisms tend to stabilize a phenotype such as color and, therefore, allow the accumulation of underlying, covert mutations just as an electrical capacitor acts to accumulate charge. And eventually, these mutations could 'break out' of that constraint to produce a sudden phenotypic change; and one way for them to break out is for a mutation to happen -- for example, one that alters a hormonal level -- releasing all this variation.

"The reason this 'capacitor' concept is important in understanding evolution and the origin of complex traits is that the common model is that a new trait gets started by a fortuitous single mutation," said Nijhout. "And while that likely happens, we believe that another important mechanism involves the accumulation of many mutations in many genes without any apparent effect because they are buffered by a homeostatic mechanism; then all of a sudden one of them alters the homeostatic mechanism and lots of genetic variation suddenly explodes and is revealed as a tremendous increase in the phenotypic variability of the species. This variation then serves as raw material for selection to mold a new adaptive trait. And so that's why we think these kinds of experiments demonstrate an important novel mechanism for the evolution of novel traits."

In further studies, Nijhout and his colleagues will seek to determine whether the type of evolutionary mechanism they demonstrated in the laboratory also occurs in nature. Also, they will seek to demonstrate the phenomenon of the genetic 'capacitor,' in which mutations can accumulate 'invisibly' without obviously affecting a trait, and whether natural selection tends to filter out deleterious mutations in such cases.


TOPICS: Philosophy
KEYWORDS: evolution; genetics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2006 5:01:41 PM PST by FlameThrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
How did it evolve if its genome didn't change?

they studied are instances in which animals with the same genetic makeup can produce quite different traits, or phenotypes, in different environments.

2 posted on 02/13/2006 5:08:34 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
And, in the end, we still have tobacco hornworms, only this time some are green and some are black.

Now, get me a tunable one!

BTW, as long as the reproductive organs still "fit", these little suckers can interbreed. However, let certain bacteria build up in those vital regions, and next thing you know there are some serious mutations, and you've got a new species or two, or three!

3 posted on 02/13/2006 5:12:09 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; Right Wing Professor; RadioAstronomer; Ichneumon; Coyoteman; CarolinaGuitarman
Kent Hovind reacts to the news of evolution being observed and tested in the laboratory:


4 posted on 02/13/2006 5:12:29 PM PST by RightWingAtheist (Creationism Is Not Conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower; Junior
A thread on this research was posted on Feb 2nd: Scientists Force Evolution in the Lab.
5 posted on 02/13/2006 5:12:32 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower

"Thus, the black mutant hornworm had "dialed-down" levels of juvenile hormone, so that the caterpillar's color-producing machinery would be more likely to be affected by temperature. By selecting for a temperature-sensitive strain, the researchers established polyphenism in the caterpillar."




I sure hope they did not fund this with tax dollars. It sounds racist.


6 posted on 02/13/2006 5:13:33 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA
While biologists have understood the basic machinery underlying polyphenisms, the mystery remained how such complex traits, which involve mutations in multiple genes, could evolve and persist.
7 posted on 02/13/2006 5:16:32 PM PST by FlameThrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
Variation within it's kind does not mean evolution.
A Doberman and Pekingese are still dogs. A Shetland and a Clydesdale are still horses.A short person and tall person are still humans.
8 posted on 02/13/2006 5:17:11 PM PST by Creationist (If the earth is old show me your proof. Salvation from the judgment of your sins is free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
["It's long been known that polyphenisms are controlled by hormones, with the brain sensing environmental signals and altering the pattern of hormonal secretions," said Nijhout. "In turn, these hormonal patterns turn sets of genes on or off to produce different traits. However, we understood only the developmental mechanism, and how it is possible with a single genome in an animal to produce two very different phenotypes," he said. "There had been theoretical models to explain the evolutionary mechanism -- how selective pressures can maintain polyphenisms in a population, and why they don't converge gradually into one form or another," said Nijhout. "But nobody had ever started with a species that didn't have a polyphenism and generated a brand-new polyphenism. Such a demonstration could offer important insights into the evolutionary mechanism underlying such traits." ]

Vey interesting bump.

9 posted on 02/13/2006 5:19:10 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie because he didn't bake one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

Not Darwinian, just Lamarckian at best. But not even that.


10 posted on 02/13/2006 5:23:42 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Yes but this is a later epoch's evolution of the same phenotype.


11 posted on 02/13/2006 5:25:26 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bvw

This is no more evolution than that which occurred when I watched a neighbor install a fuel injector on a 1957 Chevy.


12 posted on 02/13/2006 5:28:45 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

PPS I do not know if I'd call that progress.


13 posted on 02/13/2006 5:33:51 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Creationist

"Variation within it's kind does not mean evolution."

Define *kind*.


14 posted on 02/13/2006 5:39:42 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Transfers of chuncks of genes is currently being worked on extensively. See my posting of excerpts from the book "Darwin's Ghost: The Origin of Species Updated" by Steve Jones, 2000. It is #21 at "Unlocking cell secrets bolsters evolutionists", which was posted on FR about an hour ago.


15 posted on 02/13/2006 5:42:18 PM PST by gleeaikin (Question Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

dog kind, cat kind, horse kind, human kind, chimpanzee kind


16 posted on 02/13/2006 6:58:31 PM PST by Creationist (If the earth is old show me your proof. Salvation from the judgment of your sins is free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Creationist

No, I mean, define *kind*. Specifically. And scientifically.


17 posted on 02/13/2006 7:01:20 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower

And there wasn't an intelligent scientist in the group. There couldn't have been, it was evolution.


18 posted on 02/13/2006 7:26:25 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

He did define "kind", definition by a list of examples is a valid way to make a definition. The definition of "species" is quite variale, and about as specific as that simple list, btw. Same order of magnitude of specificity.


19 posted on 02/14/2006 5:33:57 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bvw
"He did define "kind", definition by a list of examples is a valid way to make a definition."

The *kinds* he mentioned having nothing to do with biology. They are meaningless, ephemeral entities that can change to suit the creationists needs.

"The definition of "species" is quite variale, and about as specific as that simple list, btw. Same order of magnitude of specificity."

No, the species concept in biology is rather precise, even if it does get blurry in certain instances (because of the non-fixity of species). That's why most of the species known to science are also known to *primitive* cultures that have had little to no contact with civilization. Species have a real biological existence. *Kinds* do not.
20 posted on 02/14/2006 5:39:08 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson