Your bullet points, which you probably wish were real bullets but aren't, are distinctly unimpressive in this context.
None of them alter the fact that Kerry nearly defeated Bush, I think because of the MSM. While some of the points do indeed reflect well on the Republican effort, they merely help to explain why Bush managed to eke out a victory. They do not change the fact that he almost didn't -- in other words, that the election was uncomfortably close, especially for an incumbent with a decent economy and an unattractive, very liberal opponent.
Some marginal paranoia. Another classic DUmmie trait.
"While some of the points do indeed reflect well on the Republican effort, they merely help to explain why Bush managed to eke out a victory."
That is a mutually exclusive statement, unless you think there really is a President Kerry. It was a historic win, by any measure.
Additionally, Rasmussen has had Bush on either side of 50% since forever. But you go right on sucking up the pap the MSM is feeding you, little boo-birdie.
"In other words, that the election was uncomfortably close, especially for an incumbent with a decent economy.
Talking about Gore in 2000 doesn't help your your paralogism.
Again, whatever I can do to help you with your Self-Zot pogrom, just let me know.