Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Melas

"Biologically speaking, their offspring have a better chance of survival overall if they are of differing paternity."

The stats on abuse of children by other than the birth father would belie your statement. This would also mirror the usual situation in the animal world, where the male often kills the offspring and then impregnates the female in order to assure success of his genetic preservation efforts.

Might I ask where you got data to support your above quoted statement?


23 posted on 02/15/2006 4:58:57 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: GladesGuru
The stats on abuse of children by other than the birth father would belie your statement. This would also mirror the usual situation in the animal world, where the male often kills the offspring and then impregnates the female in order to assure success of his genetic preservation efforts

That may or may not be true, but in either event, it's not biology. Biologically speaking, a female's genes have a better chance of surviving if she varies the paternity of her offspring. The down and dirty science is simple: Multiple paternity minimizes any chance of unfavorable heterozygous gene pairings.

24 posted on 02/15/2006 6:01:27 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson