Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmc1969

Their news report ended with the statement: "But Saddam said that Iraq would not be responsible for any attack."

Now you know and I know he meant that Iraq would somehow cover its involvement. But ABC appeared to be using the line to once again suggest that Iraq posed no direct threat to America.


16 posted on 02/15/2006 6:40:48 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: zook

As long as we can spin it that he would simply be giving WMDs to terrorists it will be worth it regardless.


21 posted on 02/15/2006 6:47:06 AM PST by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: zook
Their news report ended with the statement: "But Saddam said that Iraq would not be responsible for any attack."

Another of the many reasons for going to war-- Saddam was dangerous and had ties to dangerous people.

61 posted on 02/15/2006 9:01:56 AM PST by admiralsn (I believe God gives only three answers to prayer: Yes | Not yet | I have something better in mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson