Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Defends Port Sale to Arab Co.
Associated Press/Breitbart ^ | 2-16-2006 | By TED BRIDIS and DEVLIN BARRETT

Posted on 02/16/2006 1:40:18 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite

The Bush administration on Thursday rebuffed criticism about potential security risks of a $6.8 billion sale that gives a company in the United Arab Emirates control over significant operations at six major American ports.

Lawmakers asked the White House to reconsider its earlier approval of the deal.

The sale to state-owned Dubai Ports World was "rigorously reviewed" by a U.S. committee that considers security threats when foreign companies seek to buy or invest in American industry, National Security Council spokesman Frederick Jones said.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, run by the Treasury Department, reviewed an assessment from U.S. intelligence agencies. The committee's 12 members agreed unanimously the sale did not present any problems, the department said.

"We wanted to look at this one quite closely because it relates to ports," Stewart Baker, an assistant secretary in the Homeland Security Department, told The Associated Press. "It is important to focus on this partner as opposed to just what part of the world they come from. We came to the conclusion that the transaction should not be halted."

The unusual defense of the secretive committee, which reviews hundreds of such deals each year, came in response to criticism about the purchase of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co.

The world's fourth-largest ports company runs commercial operations at shipping terminals in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.

Four senators and three House members asked the administration Thursday to reconsider its approval. The lawmakers contended the UAE is not consistent in its support of U.S. terrorism-fighting efforts.

"The potential threat to our country is not imagined, it is real," Rep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., said in a House speech.

The Homeland Security Department said it was legally impossible under the committee's rules to reconsider its approval without evidence DP World gave false information or withheld vital details from U.S. officials. The 30-day window for the committee to voice objections has ended.

DP World said it had received all regulatory approvals.

"We intend to maintain and, where appropriate, enhance current security arrangements," the company said in a statement. "It is very much business as usual for the P&O terminals" in the United States.

In Dubai, the UAE's foreign minister described his country as an important U.S. ally but declined to respond directly to the concerns expressed in Washington.

"We have worked very closely with the United States on a number of issues relating to the combat of terrorism, prior to and post Sept. 11," Sheik Abdullah Bin Zayed al-Nahyan told The Associated Press.

U.S. lawmakers said the UAE was an important transfer point for shipments of smuggled nuclear components sent to Iran, North Korea and Libya by a Pakistani scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan. They also said the UAE was one of only three countries to recognize the now-toppled Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate government.

The State Department describes the UAE as a vital partner in the fight against terrorism. Dubai's own ports have participated since last year in U.S. efforts to detect illegal shipments of nuclear materials.

Rep. Vito Fossella, R-N.Y., urged congressional hearings on the deal.

"At a time when America is leading the world in the war on terrorism and spending billions of dollars to secure our homeland, we cannot cede control of strategic assets to foreign nations with spotty records on terrorism," Fossella said.

Critics also have cited the UAE's history as an operational and financial base for the hijackers who carried out the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

"Outsourcing the operations of our largest ports to a country with a dubious record on terrorism is a homeland security and commerce accident waiting to happen," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. "The administration needs to take another look at this deal."

Separately, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey said Thursday it will conduct its own review of the deal and urged the government to defend its decision.

In a letter to the Treasury Department, Port Authority chairman Anthony Coscia said the independent review by his agency was necessary "to protect its interests."

The lawmakers pressing the White House to reconsider included Sens. Schumer, Tom Coburn, R-Okla., Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., and Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Reps. Foley, Fossella and Chris Shays, R-Conn.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bds; dubai; dubaiportsworld; hillaryclinton; iran; israel; portauthority; portdeal; ports; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-283 next last
To: All
Bin Laden's operatives still using freewheeling Dubai

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) -- Osama bin Laden's operatives still use this freewheeling city as a logistical hub three years after more than half the Sept. 11 hijackers flew directly from Dubai to the United States in the final preparatory stages for the attack.

The recent arrest of an alleged top al-Qaeda combat coach is the latest sign that suspected members of the terrorist organization are among those who take advantage of travel rules that allow easy entry. Citizens of neighboring Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia can come to Dubai without visas, which other nationalities can get at the country's ports of entry.

Once here, it's easy to blend in to what has become a cosmopolitan crowd.

The Emirates is home to an estimated 4 million people, and nearly 75% of them are foreigners. In Dubai, expatriates of all nationalities are catered to, from concerts by top Western musicians to cricket and rugby matches to a German-styled Oktoberfest.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2004-09-02-terror-dubai_x.htm


101 posted on 02/16/2006 4:54:00 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
No, I never said that.

The articles I have seen on this topic have not yet to what degree Dubai will be responsible for security or what kind of American supervision they'll be under.

I suspect their aim (and Schumer's) is just to demoagogue the right and inflame them against Bush. Clever and effective.

102 posted on 02/16/2006 4:56:02 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
13 Febuary 2006 DP World to acquire P&O We are delighted to announce that the shareholders of P&O have approved the sale of shares to DP World.

At an EGM held in London this afternoon, the shareholders voted over 99% in favour of the DP World acquisition.

This means that the process of transferring ownership can now begin, and we expect for this to be confirmed by the court on 2nd March 2006."

Now DPW has the North American Piece....

Look at the map!

Dubai Ports World

Now they really own the world! DPW is a global monopoly!!

________________________

DP World operates container terminals and related businesses around the world. To learn more about our individual terminal facilities, click on a location on the map, or use the menu on the left.

________________________

AMAZING!!!

These guys could smuggle Afghan heroin to any of their global ports without getting caught. (Via oil tankers and local payoffs.)

103 posted on 02/16/2006 4:56:58 PM PST by Major_Risktaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

this deal will be scrubbed, Peter King was on Levin tonight talking about it his work to kill it.


104 posted on 02/16/2006 4:59:20 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

What are they THINKING??????? I am a VERY big supporter and backer of Bush, but sometimes I just don't get whathe is doing.......sad.


105 posted on 02/16/2006 5:12:02 PM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
"We wanted to look at this one quite closely because it relates to ports," Stewart Baker, an assistant secretary in the Homeland Security Department, told The Associated Press. "It is important to focus on this partner as opposed to just what part of the world they come from. We came to the conclusion that the transaction should not be halted."

So if this guy's wrong, is he liable to be shot as an accessory to terrorism? Or even fired? Or a black mark in his file? Paid vacation?

106 posted on 02/16/2006 5:20:59 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

congrats on your 1 year anniversary here at FR!! :)


107 posted on 02/16/2006 5:21:05 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: JessieHelmsJr
I behind Bush all the way but he is WRONG on this!

So you supported Bush's stomping the First Amendment and dumping a trillion-dollar burden on our backs for his stupid "free" pills for greedy geezers vote-buying scam?

108 posted on 02/16/2006 5:22:27 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

I hope you are right.. 'Dubai, which owns and controls the acquiring company in this case, has been named as a key transfer point for shipments of nuclear components that were shipped to Iran, North Korea, and Libya, which were sold by Pakistan's nuclear scientist AQ Khan.' they were only 1 of 3 countries (including Pakistan & Saudi Arabia) that recognized the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.

Plus, 'UAE are talking about expanding trade opportunities with Iran' (while the rest of the world is considering sanctions).

They definitely are not consistent on the WOT. Not the security I want at our Ports.

heck, maybe we should just put them in charge of Airport Security, yea.yea...that's the ticket...


109 posted on 02/16/2006 5:30:30 PM PST by sasha123 (Sasha123)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I'm confused. Are they already in the ports here or are we going to be one of the six ports they are talking about.


110 posted on 02/16/2006 5:42:17 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Your islamofacist cover is blown.


111 posted on 02/16/2006 5:43:24 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite; Itzlzha
Like clockwork, I tell ya



"Here's Johnnie!"

112 posted on 02/16/2006 5:44:53 PM PST by fallujah-nuker (America needs more SAC and less empty sacs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

There is a deal going on for DPW to purchase PO Nedlloyd's operations. With that purchase will be PO Nedlloyd's contracts of North American Ports. Currently PO Nedlloyd (a UK firm) operates out of 6 US Ports : Baltimore, NJ, NY, Miami, New Orleans, Phili.

But, the US has the right and authorization to block the sale if they do not want DPW to handle our ports. That is what this arguement is about. A whitehouse committe, ok'ed it, and now DC Lawmakers are disagreeing with the decision. (FIGHT IT, FIGHT IT!) The contract is scheduled for this week.


113 posted on 02/16/2006 5:47:44 PM PST by sasha123 (Sasha123)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: sasha123

Thanks. Time to call Specter and Santorum tomorrow.


114 posted on 02/16/2006 5:50:09 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: deport

you need to direct your questions to the company that paid 6.8 billion plus millions in kickbacks to control our ports as to how much they will control. I would say they will control about as much as 10 billion will buy.

Obviously it was important to these billionaire muslims to spend some of their billions to have a recognized presence at our strategic ports .


115 posted on 02/16/2006 5:52:06 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dane; Stellar Dendrite
BTW, when is chuckie schumer going to criticize Tiger Woods for playing golf in Dubai and taking their money?

Meanwhile yet another American is killed by one of your illegal aliens, while 34 year old Charlie Daniels lyrics have zero fatalities.
116 posted on 02/16/2006 5:54:07 PM PST by fallujah-nuker (America needs more SAC and less empty sacs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: sasha123
There is a deal going on for DPW to purchase PO Nedlloyd's operations. With that purchase will be PO Nedlloyd's contracts of North American Ports. Currently PO Nedlloyd (a UK firm) operates out of 6 US Ports : Baltimore, NJ, NY, Miami, New Orleans, Phili.

A question. Aren't those ports, locally controlled and the local port authority could refuse or not renew the contracts.

117 posted on 02/16/2006 5:55:05 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
"It is very much business as usual for the P&O terminals" in the United States.

That's what I'm afraid of.

118 posted on 02/16/2006 5:57:36 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Hey Libs! - Remember how conservatives looked during Clinton? Guess what you haters look like now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

"However, are you one of those who do not agree in having any ally at all in the Muslim world?"

When a muslim nation openly and publicly denounces terrorism marching in the streets and protesting terrorism around the world I will consider this nation as an ally. I have not seen this activity occur in Dubai. Have you?


119 posted on 02/16/2006 5:57:59 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican; MNJohnnie

I agree with him. Bushbot, me? LOL!


120 posted on 02/16/2006 6:02:04 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson