Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

I have not been able to determine precisely. One article said they would have control of security, another said not. I haven't found anything that definitively spells it out. Perhaps someone else will have better luck. I would like to know, in list form, exactly what would be their responsibilities.


159 posted on 02/16/2006 7:57:56 PM PST by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: singfreedom

Until I know what their responsibilities are, I am not going to complain.


172 posted on 02/16/2006 8:33:19 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

To: singfreedom

On Tony Snow's program he has been talking about how this company will in no way be responsible for security matters. The responsibility for these ports, and all ports for that matter, rests with the Feds. Snow believes that this is simply a ploy by the Dems to kowtow to big labor.


207 posted on 02/17/2006 6:34:41 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson