Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan

Implying that the secret service, because they are law enforcement, act as other law enforcement officers do. By your logic, anyone with a secret service detail could do whatever they wanted, and say "hey, law enforcement was on the scene, don't worry about it." You do know that they don't "police" the people they protect, don't you?

And do you ever tire of accusing people of having DNC talking points? You seem obsessed.


66 posted on 02/17/2006 8:48:01 AM PST by notigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: notigar
Local law enforcement WAS involved, and determined that it was an accident.

You keep making accusations with no facts to back them up. If you were not 'obsessed' with doing that, I would back off the DNC talking points comments.

So far, your implication that alcohol was a factor with no basis in fact, and your claim that law enforcement was turned away citing no source and giving no factual data to back it up, are ineffective in making your case.

You are making some serious charges here, notigar. You have an obligation to back it up with facts.

So far you have completely failed in doing so.

69 posted on 02/17/2006 8:52:03 AM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson