Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Myth of the Hunt: How the media has misfired on the Cheney accident
Time ^ | Friday, Feb. 17, 2006 | WALTER KIRN

Posted on 02/18/2006 9:16:15 AM PST by indcons

It seems more like a dream a vice president might have than something that might actually befall one. It might also inspire a great fairy tale someday. I imagine it being recited to the children of a magical, peaceful world to come — a utopia of enduring gentleness that accounts for its origins with the following fable:

"And so, after decades at the heights of power helping to mount and administer great battles that caused many thousands of deaths and injuries, the aging leader set out one afternoon into the fields of his beloved homeland in pursuit of a bird that meant no harm to him and which showed him at last — unintentionally, in a twinkling, and in a way that forever changed his heart and, over time, the hearts of all our leaders — what it was actually like to shoot a man."

It's no wonder we're spellbound by Dick Cheney's hunting accident despite the fact that no one died and the responsible party apologized (though not, perhaps, as promptly as he might have). It may be a small story in an age of big ones — an odd minor scene in history's bloody pageant — but if you let it sink down inside your mind and resonate there for just a little while, you have to confess that it’s potent, mythic stuff.

But maybe you're too annoyed by the reporting. I know I've been. For a westerner who likes to hunt and knows about the pastime's risks (I almost shot a friend once while stalking mule deer), watching the Washington press corps cover a story that hinges on a chaotic Texas quail shoot is like watching Prince Charles attempt a native dance. Because they're so good at doing so many other things, the talking heads think they're good at this thing too, even though many of them don't know the difference between a twenty-eight gauge shotgun and an any-caliber rifle. The chief difference, of course (and the relevant one here) is that a shotgun of this modest size barely constitutes a serious weapon when loaded with birdshot of the type that Cheney used. Its hard enough for such pellets to pierce a quail's heart, let alone penetrate a man's, and the fact that one did so is a testament not to Cheney's gross negligence (that question still needs more exploring)but to his supreme unluckiness.

What's made this awkward reporting not merely annoying but socially and politically divisive is that it insults the intelligence of some people who already feel insulted in other ways by the very same class of urban journalists. Outside of DC, LA and NYC, the only time folks get to meet a correspondent from a major television network or a writer from a leading newspaper is when a storm has just destroyed their neighborhood. And when the big shots do vist the outland, they always dress wrong, covered in either condescending denim or some haughty blend of wool and silk. Then they call the tornado that struck the place a "cyclone," even though the place is Minnesota and Minnesotans don't use that word.

For me and for lots of westerners I've spoken to, the greatest failure of the accident coverage has been its inability to convey, let alone fathom in the first place, just what goes on when people are chasing birds out in the middle of nowhere, in the brush, with dogs and other hunters on every side and adrenaline pumping through everybody's veins. It's a jittery, fluid situation. The coveys erupt without warning and they don't fly straight, meaning hunters don't only have to be prepared to raise their barrels at any instant, they need an awareness of the potential arcs through which they can safely swing them before they fire. Or hold their fire, as the case may be.

In the field, there are hundreds of cases that may be — and a wide range of penalties for misjudging one, from the social embarrassment of missing a bird (quail hunting has an aristocratic tone that fosters a lot of ribbing about poor marksmanship) to the mortal anguish of hitting a human being. The sport is dangerous, which heightens its thrill, but it's a civilized level of danger that's usually manageable through good equipment, experienced companions, and traditional codes of conduct. The emotions behind these codes are old and fixed: pride and shame. Like a mountain climbing expedition, a hunting trip is an excuse-free zone. Once a person picks up his gun, he is that gun. And whatever that gun causes.

It's like war, I've suggested, but it's also unlike war, mostly because the quarry poses no threat. In a time of actual war — and when one of the hunters helps to run that war — the playfulness of the sport may seem distasteful. To shoot at feathered things while obliging other folks to shoot at much larger creatures that shoot back doesn't seem right somehow, or wise. At some poetic level it tempts the gods, and the gods are always armed. For Cheney, that's the painful, humbling part. For the public, it's the engrossing, mythic part. The press may be mauling the story and prolonging it, but the accident's strange allegorical allure is beyond its power to affect.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Texas; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: cheney; harrywhittington; quailhunting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: Billthedrill
I'm afraid the author went a bit over the top in relating the cosmic irony of persons who send men and women into battle hunting unarmed birds

I agree. The "cosmic irony" angle was the article's flaw. Had he used it as an opening hook and then discarded it, maybe that would have been okay. But he reprised it the end of the piece, which was a step too far.

61 posted on 02/18/2006 12:02:57 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
Is this part BS shoveling contest?

No. It's complete and utter BS shoveling. Nice writing but childish fantasy and poor fiction. No one was obsessed or transfixed or however this neophyte thinks we reacted to a run of the mill accident where no one was very hurt and where there was no more than ten minutes worth of story anyway.

The only thing which has captured the attention of the people is the tawdry and squalid conduct of the MSM, who never seem to have sunk to a level they cannot exceed the very next opportunity.

62 posted on 02/18/2006 1:13:08 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indcons
To NBC News;

Mr David Gregory's marriage to a former Clinton Administration Lawyers and DNC activist clearly has an undue influence on NBC's White House coverage. Don't you think this fundamental conflict of interest between Mr Gregory's job and his personal life make it impossible for him to be taken seriously as a journalist? Does NBC even realize what serious questions this raises about their journalistic credibility that they would allow such a fundamental conflict of interest in such an major position of infulence? In any other industry such a conflict of interest would result in a lawsuit. It is fairly obvious after last week's childish tantrums at the White House that Mr Gregory is NOT ready for prime time. The refusal of NBC to reassign Mr Gregory raises serious questions about NBC's Journalistic integrity.

63 posted on 02/18/2006 1:17:26 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Close the UN, Keep Gitmo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill

It was the best report on the whole incident.

Can you give some details? Thanks.


64 posted on 02/18/2006 2:28:35 PM PST by jwh_Denver (Tagline randem generator working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

PS: David Gregory is a putz.


65 posted on 02/18/2006 2:33:50 PM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

So what's all this fuss about Cheney hunting for Dan Quayle and settled with a lawyer instead?

Seriously, the only thing scarier than combat is going quail hunting and a bevy of them rustle out just as you pass them. The sound rattles the best of 'em.

If you watch quail when they sense they are being tracked, they simply walk under a bush and freeze motionless. hen at the least provocation, when the first one bolts, they all take off in a rush. Scares the living dickens out of a hunter if he's being stealthy trying to sneak up on them.

So the last thing you want to do is sneak up on the back side of a hunter looking for quail.


66 posted on 02/18/2006 2:52:48 PM PST by Cvengr (<;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: indcons
the responsible party apologized (though not, perhaps, as promptly as he might have).

Apologized to whom, the PRESS? He didn't shoot 'the Press, or the American People. He shot Harry Whittington, and I imagine the first comment out of his mouth was "Oh God, Harry, I'm so sorry!"

I'm sure he has apologized to Mr. Whittington plenty of times, he just hasn't flogged himself on national TV, so, for the press, it didn't count.

67 posted on 02/18/2006 7:39:45 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Get the net, Fred! We've got a live one here, and his meds need adjusting STAT!


68 posted on 02/18/2006 8:04:21 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Time's writers are constantly searching for new, exciting ways to misinterpret the world.


69 posted on 02/18/2006 8:09:39 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
THAT's where I stopped. APOLOGIZE TO WHO?????? I would bet everything my family owns, that the first words The VP said to his friend was "I'M SORRY!" Who else did he need to apologize to???

Really! My jaw dropped when I saw that comment in there.

70 posted on 02/18/2006 8:13:36 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: indcons
quail hunting has an aristocratic tone

What world does this bozo come from? In my world, quail season meant a reliable way to have meat on the table. Aristocratic? LOL!

71 posted on 02/18/2006 8:24:50 PM PST by McGavin999 (If Intelligence Agencies can't find leakers, how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I don't know what you are going-on about concerning this "dead horse whining [I] post on EVERY thread," so please point it out when I do. Otherwise, piss off newb.


72 posted on 02/19/2006 11:08:03 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson