Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 19 February 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 19 February 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 02/19/2006 5:03:51 AM PST by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, February 19th, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Evan Bayh, D-Ind.; former Sen. Alan Simpson, R-Wyo.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Bill Frist, R-Tenn., and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Chertoff; Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., and Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va.; basketball player Shaquille O'Neal.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Chertoff; British ambassador to the United States David Manning, German ambassador to the U.S. Wolfgang Ischinger and French ambassador to the U.S. Jean-David Levitte; retired Army Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton, formerly in charge of Iraqi army training.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; alansimpson; bayh; boxer; chertoff; dhs; evanbayh; facethenation; fns; foxnewssunday; frist; guests; iraqiarmy; lateedition; lieberman; lineup; meetthepress; mtp; oif; pauleaton; shaq; sunday; talkshows; thisweek; tomdavis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,041 next last
To: Beckwith
Chertoff did extremely well before the bloviators last week.

He would be worth listening to, without a doubt.

221 posted on 02/19/2006 6:52:36 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

In Real corporate world, David Gregory would have been recalled from WH, like they did for Terry Moran, John Roberts etc..


222 posted on 02/19/2006 6:52:57 AM PST by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I just do not understand this secrecy thing. What I see is people wishing to retain some sort of private life but release a tremendous amount of info and also have transparent private lives.

Tbe press have never got any evidence on either Bush or Cheney of any sexual impropriety and that I think ticks them off. They cannot imagine how someone can be married for as long as they have and there be no dirt to dig and even more it is obvious both of them still enjoy and want the company of their spouses.

Yet another thing that the left cannot understand and therefore there must be a cover-up.


223 posted on 02/19/2006 6:53:02 AM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Darth Republican

Maureen Dowd has the flatest emotionless voice I have ever heard. No emotion, nothing.


224 posted on 02/19/2006 6:53:51 AM PST by tioga (Speaking out from the god-foresaken frozen tundra of the land of the hildebeast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Simpson was on with Matthews the very first day that the hunting accident was disclosed.

He made an outstanding case for the Vice President, which Matthews chose to ignore.

Matthews has his agenda and is not going to be bothered by a few facts.

225 posted on 02/19/2006 6:53:51 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: old_sage_says

YES!


226 posted on 02/19/2006 6:53:53 AM PST by beyond the sea (Alan Simpson: all you get is "controversy, crap and confusion" from the media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: snugs
Morning snugs and congrats to all who participated in last weeks thread. Another great job by MNJ as well.
227 posted on 02/19/2006 6:54:39 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support the New Media and F.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: snugs

It's just a talking point without any real basis in fact, snugs. What helped fuel it from the beginning, I think, is that Cheney held energy talks without releasing any information about them to the public and this reminded people too much about Hillary's secretive health care initiative.

I think that's what started it, at least. Maybe someone else remember this differently.


228 posted on 02/19/2006 6:54:40 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
...they do watch the evening news

And our local NBC channel did not even mention President Bush's powerful appearance in Tampa on Friday.

Many people think he is doing nothing day after day.

229 posted on 02/19/2006 6:54:45 AM PST by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

He's is a foul entity.


230 posted on 02/19/2006 6:54:46 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Absolutely and in a way if it were not for the circumstances would be funny.


231 posted on 02/19/2006 6:55:05 AM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Brit says the leaking of the Eastern European facilities for holding and questioning terroroists resulted in the LOSS of those facilities. (I did not know that.)


232 posted on 02/19/2006 6:55:07 AM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Peach

More idiot babble from the Insane Senate Posse. HEY Senate MORONS, what part of Article 2 of the US Constitution do you NOT understand? " Commander in Chief? Repel sudden attack"???? Get it you Senatorial idiots? Quit trying to straddle the issue you cowards and tell the lunatic Left to go do themselves.


233 posted on 02/19/2006 6:55:15 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("Close the UN, Keep Gitmo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Good morning rodguy911 and thanks. I 'll post the media nuggets in a bit.


234 posted on 02/19/2006 6:55:36 AM PST by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Darth Republican

"Perhaps a Freeper poll is in order today:
Who's wearing the shorter skirt today?
A) Mary Matalin
B) Maureen Dowd
C) David Gregory"

My vote is C.


235 posted on 02/19/2006 6:55:57 AM PST by old_sage_says ("Man does not live by his words alone, despite the fact that he sometimes has to eat them" A S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

I enjoy Neal Gabler. He fully represents the mindset of the left. I am sure Gabler actually believes what he says, which is scary if one realizes how crazy he is as he says things. Unlike Juan Williams who just parrots the DNC talking points, Gabler could write them.



236 posted on 02/19/2006 6:55:59 AM PST by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Is MTP repeated on one of the cable networks? For some reason the south Florida affiliate isn't carrying it today.

Thanks.


237 posted on 02/19/2006 6:56:00 AM PST by clintonh8r (If you don't support the mission you don't support the troops. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anita

Nagin and BlankO undid all the criticism of the President.


238 posted on 02/19/2006 6:56:05 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

He IS a foul entity!


239 posted on 02/19/2006 6:56:06 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Graham has been awful surveillance issue. He is never asked to explain just what research what law what anything upon which his opinion is based.

He has been worse on the torture issue. Graham seems to think that just because he was a JAG attorney he is the final authority on all things related to military code of conduct. He arguments never get past "I was a JAG, I think this is illegal". Whereas defenders of the President's policies quote statute and case law, Lindsey just says it is because I say it is. No one ever asked him to define torture. For all we know his interrogations would look like a scene from the Monty Python skit on the Spanish Inquisition.

As for his time as a JAG, how do we know he never got past reviewing contracting documents for time, purpose and amount?

240 posted on 02/19/2006 6:56:12 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson