I added the links, and a tad of bold, underlining, etc. Everyone be nice.
|
Actually, any idea that needs the help of the judiciary to stay current, has got a fundamental problem.
And just as I was reading that Judge's decision I recalled I hadn't gotten this month's Discover. Surprisingly, or maybe not surprisingly, it had an article on MIMIVIRUS, which has more genes in it than many bacteria, and is very complex.
This piece is worth reading by everyone.
Although it doesn't "dethrone" evolution, I don't think the authors of the piece quite understood that it's possible "evolution" takes place much more like the installation of a fuel injection system in a '57 Chevy than in small, incremental steps, all of which involve mutation. At this moment the world's oceans are filled with millions of different viruses, with different genes. Our cells are also filled with tens of thousands of different viral bodies right in our genome. Our own genes are of the same class and kind as viral genes, and our chromosomes even take the same shape as virus chromosomes.
Are viruses continuing to insert themselves into our genome, and what purposes are all those dormant genes in the viruses filling the ocean fulfilling?
And are those viruses just the happenstance creations of bacterial infections, or were they dispatched in gross shipments from vast distances across the Cosmos?
Evolution and creation are equally untestable.
"Kitzmiller is ID's Waterloo" placemarker
So that's why FOIA inquiry was required.
Brown boots or black?
Is this true? I thought he was waffling.
Or more accurately, the controversies aren't related to the basic theory of evolution. The controversies are in the details.