Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: .cnI redruM
The problem with the legislation supporting most environmental concerns, is this. It becomes a vehicle to control the lives of others, and therefore becomes a compliant and useful tool of people who's agenda has nothing to do with protecting nature.

I couldn't agree more. The question is how do we balance these competing interests. I'm not sure regulation at the state or local level makes anymore sense as watersheds know no boundaries.

15 posted on 02/21/2006 8:16:34 AM PST by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: GreenFreeper
If watersheds know no boundaries, as you claim, than any legislation at all regulating their use, potentially devalues any piece of land I happen to own. Giving a government agency a blanket power like that is in no way in the interest of liberty. Unless a logical and sane border on what land is considered "wetlands" can be established, the government has no Constitutional right to regulate their use.
16 posted on 02/21/2006 8:19:54 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Spreading liberal beliefs is as wrong as spreading AIDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson