To: .cnI redruM
The CWA definetly needs reform or at least clarification. Private property rights should include protection against neighbors influencing your private property- polluting ones water or air. This needs to extend beyond navigable waterways...that marsh the protects the water supply is important to more than just the land on which it resides.
4 posted on
02/21/2006 7:38:06 AM PST by
GreenFreeper
(Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
To: GreenFreeper
Private property rights should include protection against neighbors influencing your private property- polluting ones water or air.
This protection existed before the creation of the clean water act.
8 posted on
02/21/2006 7:43:09 AM PST by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: GreenFreeper
That was the original purpose of the Civil Law Code. Should this hostile neighbor be appraised of the damage they are doing and do nothing to abate their behavior, possible criminal statutes for vandalism, or in a worse case, reckless endangerment, may very well apply.
11 posted on
02/21/2006 7:49:57 AM PST by
.cnI redruM
(Spreading liberal beliefs is as wrong as spreading AIDS.)
To: GreenFreeper
"This needs to extend beyond navigable waterways...that marsh the protects the water supply is important to more than just the land on which it resides"
If you want to control someone Else's private property, you should buy it, then its your choice!
27 posted on
02/21/2006 12:09:50 PM PST by
Beagle8U
(An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson