Just......speechless.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: getsoutalive
2 posted on
02/21/2006 7:32:30 AM PST by
vrwc0915
("Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants,)
To: getsoutalive
There just aren't enough middle fingers on a single human body to express what my feelings would be to them if I ever got a notice like that.
3 posted on
02/21/2006 7:34:16 AM PST by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
To: getsoutalive
4 posted on
02/21/2006 7:34:35 AM PST by
righthand man
(WE'RE SOUTHERN AND PROUD OF IT)
To: getsoutalive
That's a law waiting for a test case.
5 posted on
02/21/2006 7:38:06 AM PST by
wideawake
To: getsoutalive
Although I can see the arguments for and against this policy, this even if they live in another state is unacceptable. What right or power can the state of New York have to tax a driver in say Missouri or Nevada.
6 posted on
02/21/2006 7:39:28 AM PST by
dpa5923
(Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
To: getsoutalive
Legalized theft!
To: getsoutalive
It gives new meaning to the term *highway robbery*. Thank you NYS. And polititions can't figure out why people are leaving or not moving here. They're just shooting themselves in the foot with their outrageous legislation. I want out of here sooooo bad.
8 posted on
02/21/2006 7:39:56 AM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: getsoutalive
speed trap what a hoot! he was doing at least 75 in the 45. the cop gave him a break by writing the ticket under 75. they should send him another ticket lol.
11 posted on
02/21/2006 7:42:29 AM PST by
Omglol
To: getsoutalive
Wow. Another creative form of governmental extortion.
12 posted on
02/21/2006 7:43:01 AM PST by
TChris
("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
To: getsoutalive
Thanks for the heads up. I didn't know Michigan also had this "tax". I'm going to have to look this up.
13 posted on
02/21/2006 7:43:14 AM PST by
Flifuss
(SCE to Aux.)
To: getsoutalive
We've got the same thing in Michigan. I got a ticket for not having my proof of insurance ($95 fine). Then I have to pay a "driver's responsibility fee" to the State of Michigan of $200 a year for two years. So my $95 ticket is actually $495! I suppose I'd rather the state get $400 from me this way then have them take $400 from me in more income tax. At least I won't drive without my proof of insurance again!
14 posted on
02/21/2006 7:46:00 AM PST by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: getsoutalive
Despite being caught in what he considered a brazen speed trap -- the speed limit was 45 MPH where he was caught, but 55 MPH at the same location in the opposite direction -- he accepted the $155 fine for driving 72 MPH thinking by paying the matter would be settled.Uh... DUH!
Just goes to show: FIGHT EVERY TICKET!
15 posted on
02/21/2006 7:46:23 AM PST by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: getsoutalive
I think he should refuse to pay.If this "tax" isn't one that's also levied on residents of the State of New York,I can't see how a Federal court would allow the law to stand.
To: getsoutalive
Taxation without representation?
17 posted on
02/21/2006 7:47:52 AM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: getsoutalive
What are you all griping about? It's only NON-VOTERS in other states who are getting robbed, err, taxed, and after all, it's only to enforce highway safety, for the chillens, and how could you claim that "speeding" laws are just revenue makers.
18 posted on
02/21/2006 7:50:31 AM PST by
jonascord
("As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!")
To: getsoutalive
State government cost must be out of control. I suspect it's the defined benefit pension plans that were sweetened up in the late 1990's / early 2000's during the stock market bubble. Now these plans are underperforming and State's are looking for new sources of revenue anywhere they can, ethical or not, legal or not.
20 posted on
02/21/2006 7:52:12 AM PST by
mpreston
To: getsoutalive
"...he must either pay the state an annual $100 tax or a lump sum of $300."
Brought to you by the state that spawned Upchuck Schumer and the Heinous Harridan, the two RATs that never met a tax they didn't like. Is anyone surprised?
21 posted on
02/21/2006 7:52:14 AM PST by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: getsoutalive
To: getsoutalive
Please allow me to apologize for all the communists in NYS who have created this and many more insidious laws. Would it be possible for the other 49 states to declare war on NYS? Under the interstate commerce clause, is NYS allowed to do this?
23 posted on
02/21/2006 7:54:16 AM PST by
Wurlitzer
(The difference between democrats and terrorists is the terrorists don't claim to support the troops)
To: getsoutalive
That makes one not want to go back to NY
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson