Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The last time I heard this story, global warming was definitely the cause. Now, it's our encroachment on their habitat. But there's a problem: Humans only occupy a small precentage of the planet. That alone can not be a contributing factor in such a mass extinction. Sounds more like natural selection to me. In which case, we should be minding our own business if we are honest about not interfering with nature.
1 posted on 02/21/2006 10:16:18 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: presidio9

If I were Karen Lips, I'd think about getting a name change.

Beyond that, all I have to say is that we are all DOOMED! Yessiree bob, time to put your head between your legs and kiss the old 'sit-upon" good-bye!


2 posted on 02/21/2006 10:19:56 AM PST by RexBeach ("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I'll say it... "Bush's fault". Ultimately, he and all Republicans, shall be blamed anyhow.


3 posted on 02/21/2006 10:20:27 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Don't blame me, blame these teenage schoolgirls!


4 posted on 02/21/2006 10:22:13 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
This is exactly what I don't understand. The basic premise of environmentalism is flawed when we can not tell the difference between extinction due to human over harvesting/encroachment and natural selection.

We are constantly told not to mess with nature, but they interfere with natural selection on a mass scale.

In any case, it solidifies my belief that most environmentalists (not conservationists) are crackpots in search of a god.
5 posted on 02/21/2006 10:23:57 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I noticed no mention of the French.


7 posted on 02/21/2006 10:29:28 AM PST by Jaysun (The plain truth is that I am not a fair man, and don't want to hear both sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I believe it...the numbers of frogs these days ..at least leopard frogs is way down from the numbers I remember 40 yrs ago..


11 posted on 02/21/2006 10:50:53 AM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit our sister..but we knew just what to do...we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
"..triggered a mission to rescue frogs.."

Oh, thank God! And none too soon, either!

At least they aren't using our tax dollars to fund this mission. (Whew!)

I dunno, all this talk about lips and frogs and whatnot...

12 posted on 02/21/2006 10:51:58 AM PST by Designer (Just a nit-pick'n and chagrin'n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9; aculeus; dighton; Lijahsbubbe; martin_fierro
Frogs are considered a good indicator of the health of the Earth.


18 posted on 02/21/2006 11:21:24 AM PST by Thinkin' Gal (As it was in the days of NO...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Someone call Australia! I believe that they are in the midst of a cane toad epidemic (introduced a couple of decades ago) that is killing the local fauna.

I wonder if a bit of fungus might not be the ticket for their problem?


19 posted on 02/21/2006 11:22:07 AM PST by heldmyw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson